Auburn University's Bid List!!!

[Glitterkitty]

Originally posted by Angels&Arrows
You are sooo not geeky... If so, I am also guilty...

"In a whisper... you might want to recheck the excel... everyone took 55... except... Zeta-56, Pi Phi-50, Tri Delta-54 and AXiD-? (according to my excel)"

You know what, right before I read your post I totally realized I messed up!

This is what I did. I put the girls in a sopread sheet and then looked at the number they started on and ended on. Example: AXO had girls from #1 to #55. For some reason, my stupid head said "OK 55-1=54. They took 54 girls. Then ADPi had #56-110. Again 110-56=54. "

SO I had a mathematical calulation error as well. And here I thought I was doing something nice......I'm just a stupid head.

[bekibug]

Originally posted by AnchorAlumna
According to the list, Alpha Xi Delta pledged 35 and Pi Beta Phi pledged 50. Quota was 55. I imagine both groups have picked up some more by now.

We snap bidded 5 or 6 girls Sunday morning before bids were distributed. Still working on it though...

[KappaKittyCat]

Originally posted by carnation
Sororities release first and then the girls get their results and cut from what they have left and it's like someone expects the sororities to be clairvoyant. ABC might love these 3 girls from Atlanta and have no idea that everyone else does too and that these girls will be cutting them...in the meantime, ABC releases 3 more girls they love and who would come back to them because they're required to release so many.

That's why I really think that a system like bid matching should be used in these situations to determine who goes to which parties. At the end of each round, PNMs should be required to rank all the sororities they attended. On the sorority side, each group should make all the cuts they want/need to (for reasons like GPA, rudeness, etc.). If they have more women remaining than they are allowed to invite back, they rank them, plain and simple. Then the computer would match up PNMs to parties, just like bids are matched. That way, ABC wouldn't have to cut more people than they wanted to. Then, maybe, if there were women who didn't "party match" with ABC earlier in the week because they got their top nine choices, but weren't initially cut by ABC for reasons like GPA, those women could be extended an invitation to a later party for ABC.

I mean, how hard could it be, really. If we've got computer programs that can bid-match, then certainly we can make computer programs that can party-match, too.

[AUDG]

Originally posted by KappaKittyCat
That's why I really think that a system like bid matching should be used in these situations to determine who goes to which parties. At the end of each round, PNMs should be required to rank all the sororities they attended. On the sorority side, each group should make all the cuts they want/need to (for reasons like GPA, rudeness, etc.). If they have more women remaining than they are allowed to invite back, they rank them, plain and simple. Then the computer would match up PNMs to parties, just like bids are matched. That way, ABC wouldn't have to cut more people than they wanted to. Then, maybe, if there were women who didn't "party match" with ABC earlier in the week because they got their top nine choices, but weren't initially cut by ABC for reasons like GPA, those women could be extended an invitation to a later party for ABC.

I mean, how hard could it be, really. If we've got computer programs that can bid-match, then certainly we can make computer programs that can party-match, too.

Do you realize how LONG that would take for the sororities?? It took us 4 hours just to rank the girls who attended pref for our bid lists. I couldn't imagine how long it would take to rank all 1000 girls after the first day of parties!

[KappaKittyCat]

Originally posted by AUDG
Do you realize how LONG that would take for the sororities?? It took us 4 hours just to rank the girls who attended pref for our bid lists. I couldn't imagine how long it would take to rank all 1000 girls after the first day of parties!

I realize that it would take a while, especially for schools with huge recruitments, but there's got to be a way for chapters to streamline the process. And I think it's worth it if it means that more sororities will take quota, and more PNMs will find their homes.

[PinkRose1098]

Originally posted by AUDG
Do you realize how LONG that would take for the sororities?? It took us 4 hours just to rank the girls who attended pref for our bid lists. I couldn't imagine how long it would take to rank all 1000 girls after the first day of parties!

It all depends on the system that you use to make up your bid list and invite lists.

[kappaloo]

I could write the software - what are you describing is a maximum cost/flow (scheduling) problem! That's my minor!

Basically what is being described is how my school does co-op rankings. It would easier for the chapters to not rank the women by order as much as in terms of 1, 2, 3 etc. You could only give as many 1s as you could invite back, but 2-3 just specifies preference if one of thethe '1s' decides to drop you. Of course, you'd have to have the option to NR - not rank (or drop). This simplifies it for the sorority (or employer) but requires more complex software algorithms.

/end geek rant.

[AUDeltaGam]

Originally posted by PinkRose1098
It all depends on the system that you use to make up your bid list and invite lists.

I'm in AUDG's chapter and if we did it the way we did bid lists, it would take almost 4 hours.

[bekibug]

Originally posted by AUDeltaGam
I'm in AUDG's chapter and if we did it the way we did bid lists, it would take almost 4 hours.

For real; it takes us at least 3 just to get all the girls we had ranked.