» GC Stats |
Members: 329,743
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,139
|
Welcome to our newest member, loganttso2709 |
|
 |
|

06-08-2004, 05:44 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,584
|
|
Right or wrong?
I asked a good friend of mine who is a Kappa if he had ever been Branded and what he thought of it!
He emphatically stated "It is the dumbest damn thing that I could think of".
An Omega friend I asked He showed me his.
Of legal age or not, it is the impropriority of having a Greek Letters attached is the problem in todays P C Society.
It still leads to possible law suits that could bankrupt an Orgaization.
Risk Management is a serious thing.
An "Adult" (18) can say, I did it of my own free will, well, the School and The National may look at it differently. These YOUNG ADULTS are members of both the School and The Greek Organization.
The whole idea is if the school or the Greek Organization looks down on this, they will be GONE!
Law suits make all involved very nervous!
Some really do not give to good advice or thinking on this.
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|

06-08-2004, 06:07 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NooYawk
Posts: 5,478
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tom Earp
Right or wrong?
I asked a good friend of mine who is a Kappa if he had ever been Branded and what he thought of it!
He emphatically stated "It is the dumbest damn thing that I could think of".
An Omega friend I asked He showed me his.
Of legal age or not, it is the impropriority of having a Greek Letters attached is the problem in todays P C Society.
It still leads to possible law suits that could bankrupt an Orgaization.
Risk Management is a serious thing.
An "Adult" (18) can say, I did it of my own free will, well, the School and The National may look at it differently. These YOUNG ADULTS are members of both the School and The Greek Organization.
The whole idea is if the school or the Greek Organization looks down on this, they will be GONE!
Law suits make all involved very nervous!
Some really do not give to good advice or thinking on this.
|
It's a shame...the Kappa brand is so sexy!
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life
Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
|

06-08-2004, 06:30 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Now hiding from GC stalkers
Posts: 3,188
|
|
I'd rather my son got a small brand, than a tattoo.
I'd rather my son got a small brand, than a tattoo.
He has a right to choose, and he has the right to annoy his father.
|

06-08-2004, 06:32 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Re: I'd rather my son got a small brand, than a tattoo.
Quote:
Originally posted by hoosier
...and he has the right to annoy his father.
|
And,when in the mood, he will find every possible opportunity to do just that.
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|

06-08-2004, 11:59 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tustin, California
Posts: 825
|
|
Re "The Duck Rule"
There is an easy way to beat the argument that an event wasn't an official event because it wasn't on the calendar or in the minutes:
"Mr. President, if you had an activity that you thought that the general fraternity would not approve of, would you still put it on the calendar/"
"No sir"
"The branding wasn't on the calendar, was it?"
"No sir"
"So you deny that you were trying to hide it from your national fraternity?"
It's an argumentative question, and the Judge would throw it out, but itis the asking of the question that the jury often hears, and not the answer.
|

06-09-2004, 08:40 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
Posts: 141
|
|
Re: Re: I'd rather my son got a small brand, than a tattoo.
Quote:
Originally posted by DeltAlum
And,when in the mood, he will find every possible opportunity to do just that.
|
 .....that's what makes this a great country.....LOL
|

06-09-2004, 10:21 AM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,519
|
|
Re: Re "The Duck Rule"
Quote:
Originally posted by john1082
There is an easy way to beat the argument that an event wasn't an official event because it wasn't on the calendar or in the minutes:
"Mr. President, if you had an activity that you thought that the general fraternity would not approve of, would you still put it on the calendar/"
"No sir"
"The branding wasn't on the calendar, was it?"
"No sir"
"So you deny that you were trying to hide it from your national fraternity?"
It's an argumentative question, and the Judge would throw it out, but itis the asking of the question that the jury often hears, and not the answer.
|
he shouldn't answer the first question to begin with. It's self-incrimination (against the 5th Amendment).
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

06-09-2004, 12:27 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Reaching new heights in EXPLOITATION
Posts: 1,055
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ZZ-kai-
I know our risk management guidelines, and I am pretty sure that if a Beta gets killed in the streets of Jamaica while coming home from a rave, the parents of him cannot sue the General Fraternity, just because he is a Beta.
Thats the point I am making.
|
You cannot compare this event with branding. Jamaica and raves have nothing to do with Beta. Someone getting a brand with Beta Theta Pi obviously involves Beta. Particularly because I would imagine, in most cases, it's difficult to brand yourself. And somehow I doubt that the majority of brands are done by legit tattoo/body modification parlors. If a brother is branding a brother or pledge, or a pledge is branding a pledge, how can Beta not be somewhat implicated?
ktsnake, I agree with you. Really, really good risk management means not only making sure you're not breaking the law, but not doing anything that would make anyone THINK you're breaking the law. I wouldn't want to call my national office and tell them that we were branding each other, either. Not because of hazing laws, but because I actually care about the reputation of my chapter.
__________________
phi mu
|

06-09-2004, 12:42 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NooYawk
Posts: 5,478
|
|
Everyone who has said they'd been too concerned to tell their Headquarters, are you forgetting that you are partial owners to the INCORPORATED organizations? There should never be too much concerned that you couldn't call your Headquarters to simply ask if there are any national rules against you getting your own brand. Even your president doesn't "own" your organization any more than you do.
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life
Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
|

06-09-2004, 12:43 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,598
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ktsnake
This Sigma Chi branding appears to have been part of their organization's program.
|
FYI: Branding is not now, nor ever was, a Sigma Chi Fraternity program.
|

06-09-2004, 12:53 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: God's Country: M'sippy
Posts: 166
|
|
okay i personally see nothing wrong with branding. its not much different than a tattoo and i think its better than a tattoo in that it has more meaning. even though the skulls made it look REALLY painful. you brand your body when you get a tattoo. you face nearly the same fears with tattooing than you would with branding. they are both painful and can both get infected.
|

06-09-2004, 01:02 PM
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,668
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TSteven
FYI: Branding is not now, nor ever was, a Sigma Chi Fraternity program.
|
Local chapters vary greatly (with my organization at least) and I have no reason to believe that Sigma Chi would be much different.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|

06-09-2004, 01:14 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
|
|
Here is where you use common sense.
Yes you have every right to do it.
Yes you can do it on your own and not as part of a program and not haze.
But should you do it?
I would say no.
The world is unfair. Sometimes you make sacrifices.
Why not encourage people to do what they want over summer break or back at home...wherever just to move that perception away.
It's not always about what is right or wrong but the perception.
-Rudey
|

06-09-2004, 02:04 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,144
|
|
Since when did it become against the law to be branded? Just because a Beta brands a "B" on his shoulder, doesn't mean its a Beta event and Beta (HQ) can be held responsible for any infection/loss that may be a result of the brand. Unless something was forced upon them or they were made to do it or it was a requirement for entrance into the org....etc., the org. cannot be held accountable. If someone chose to do this on their own, they're the only ones who can be held accountable.
But, if what you are saying is "If you affiliate with a GLO, and something randomly happens where someone else is injured, that person can sue that GLO because you are a member of it", then I guess your thoughts are correct.
But, I don't believe that.
ETA: I know a kid, who branded an 'Omega' on his shoulder when he was a freshman in college. He then proceeded to initiate into Phi Delta Theta. Then, he found out that the 'Omega' stood for Omega Psi Phi, and not 'something cool that his football and basketball playing idols' did.
Can Omega Psi Phi be sued for this kid being a dumbass? Absolutely not.
Quote:
Originally posted by CarolinaCutie
You cannot compare this event with branding. Jamaica and raves have nothing to do with Beta. Someone getting a brand with Beta Theta Pi obviously involves Beta. Particularly because I would imagine, in most cases, it's difficult to brand yourself. And somehow I doubt that the majority of brands are done by legit tattoo/body modification parlors. If a brother is branding a brother or pledge, or a pledge is branding a pledge, how can Beta not be somewhat implicated?
ktsnake, I agree with you. Really, really good risk management means not only making sure you're not breaking the law, but not doing anything that would make anyone THINK you're breaking the law. I wouldn't want to call my national office and tell them that we were branding each other, either. Not because of hazing laws, but because I actually care about the reputation of my chapter.
|
Last edited by ZZ-kai-; 06-09-2004 at 02:11 PM.
|

06-09-2004, 02:10 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
zz,
There is some very good advice above. Sometimes you just have to understand how things can happen, how life (and law) is sometimes unfair, and go with it.
If you want to take a chance, just be ready to accept the consequences. Heck, chapters do that every day. That's why we have a Risk Management forum.
And that's why we lose a lot of chapters.
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|