'Satirical' Obama Cover Stirs Controversy

[nittanyalum]

Originally Posted by KSigkid

What do you mean about "turnabout?" McCain and the Republicans didn't do the cover, the New Yorker did.

Whoa! Sensitive. Just a turn of phrase, I meant it in terms of Obama got a cover now McCain has one. Man, everyone's so touchy about these candidates and we still have 3 1/2 months to go, this campaign season has drawn on way past painful in my book.

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by nittanyalum

Whoa! Sensitive. Just a turn of phrase, I meant it in terms of Obama got a cover now McCain has one. Man, everyone's so touchy about these candidates and we still have 3 1/2 months to go, this campaign season has drawn on way past painful in my book.

Haha, not sensitive at all. Just didn't understand where you were going with the statement.

[nittanyalum]

Originally Posted by KSigkid

Haha, not sensitive at all. Just didn't understand where you were going with the statement.

LOL. 'k

[PeppyGPhiB]

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has a posting today about this. The Vanity Fair cover is fairly close to one the paper's Pulitzer Prize-winning political columnist did last week:
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/t...ves/144176.asp

[DaemonSeid]

Originally Posted by PeppyGPhiB

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has a posting today about this. The Vanity Fair cover is fairly close to one the paper's Pulitzer Prize-winning political columnist did last week:
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/t...ves/144176.asp

i think that the Vanity Fair got cindy depction right tho...cuz....Cindy never ever sports a shyte face grin like the one depicted on the national review...