I luv y'all

[Tippiechick]

Originally posted by DeltAlum
It isn't, unless there was perhaps a quote of something which violated the TOS, or your post didn't make sense after another post was deleted.

But, you see the quote was something HOOSIER had said. How am I violating the TOS when I quote something HOOSIER said?

And, the two posts were completely separate.

So, again, I would like to know why you deleted both posts? Do you even have any idea what they said?

[Tippiechick]

Originally posted by Tom Earp
Sorry, but at least part of the wording was correct!, Oh, Yours I was refering to

If there was nothing to post, then there would be no posts would there?

Nice try, Earp. However, your post once again doesn't make the slightest bit of sense.

[DeltAlum]

Originally posted by Tippiechick
But, you see the quote was something HOOSIER had said. How am I violating the TOS when I quote something HOOSIER said?

And, the two posts were completely separate.

So, again, I would like to know why you deleted both posts? Do you even have any idea what they said?

Maybe Hoosier said something that violated the TOS. Or maybe he quoted someone who did.

No, I don't remember what it said.

I don't much care either.

If there wasn't something wrong with it, it would likely still be there.

[Tippiechick]

You're right. Point taken.

[saetex]

Originally posted by frathole
Hazing Rules, I think it should be mandatory.








(setting the over under at 20 minutes for this post to survive, call into the at-line bets desk at Balley's Casino in Atlantic City to put your money down and check their at-line website for updates on the status, the name of the bet is SWEETFRAT_HAZING_RULES)

yes, outstanding post. hazing should be mandatory. i think that too many people think that hazing is dangerous and threatening, when in actuality, it is the opposite. i dont know one person who has gone through pledgeship and hazing that has not said it was the best worst time of their life.

[GeekyPenguin]

Originally posted by saetex
yes, outstanding post. hazing should be mandatory. i think that too many people think that hazing is dangerous and threatening, when in actuality, it is the opposite. i dont know one person who has gone through pledgeship and hazing that has not said it was the best worst time of their life.

Some people even write stories about how they "love" hazing on the Internet!

[valkyrie]

Originally posted by GeekyPenguin
Some people even write stories about how they "love" hazing on the Internet!

And how they like to grope their pledge brothers.

[GeekyPenguin]

Originally posted by valkyrie
And how they like to grope their pledge brothers.

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

[sugar and spice]

Originally posted by GeekyPenguin
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Did you perhaps mean BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALS?











And now I think I'm starting to understand why those who promote hazing enjoy it so much.

[33girl]

Originally posted by sugar and spice
And now I think I'm starting to understand why those who promote hazing enjoy it so much.

You mean somewhat like the PMRC? You know, those overzealous senators' wives in the 80's led by Tipper Gore who were on a crusade to stamp out naughty lyrics in music? And to find the naughty lyrics they had to listen to those songs OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER again?

[HotDamnImAPhiMu]

Why'd you have to drag Tipper into this?

[33girl]

Originally posted by HotDamnImAPhiMu
Why'd you have to drag Tipper into this?

Because she sucks?

[HotDamnImAPhiMu]

Tipper doesn't say things like that about you.

[33girl]

That's because I don't suck.

[HotDamnImAPhiMu]

Poor Tipper.

You're gunning for a no-invite to her birthday party if you're not careful.