Quote:
Originally posted by wrigley
If she wants to pose for a magazine that's her choice. However if she used the composite in the photo shoot and her sisters faces are visible in the layout is there recourse for that chapter?. I'd be suprised that they would give permission for their faces to be shown in Playboy.
|
The picture is *from* the composite but it's not the actual composite. So it's basically like a school picture. Underneath it says, "KD Sorority".
James, you should read up on some of the statistics available on the prevalance of porn vs. domestic violence, and what CATs and MRIs can reveal is going on in the brains of violent sexual offenders when they view (even soft-core) pornography.
While I don't have a problem with her posing, I think there's certainly enough evidence to show porn might be a lot less harmless than we think. And for that reason she probably should've left her letters off the page -- the jury is still out for too many people.
I think she has the right to pose, even as a KD active. But she should keep her affiliation OUT. She knew going into it it would be a controversial issue.
If she were a Phi Mu active, I think there'd probably be about a 60% chance she'd have her badge yanked by the chapter. (Well, only nationals can really take a badge, so I should say I think the chapter would SUGGEST it be yanked.)
BUT, I'm pretty sure she mentioned having graduated. Which means she's not a collegiate. Which means KD nationals probably isn't going to do anything about it. (I don't think Phi Mu nationals would.) If we went after every alumna member who was published in bad light........ oy.