Thought I'd share some comments about Undeclared that was sent over the AFA listserve...it offers another viewpoint of the episode and media portrayal of Greeks...from a Greek! For those of you that don't know the AFA is the Association of Fraternity Advisors and is a professional organization for Greek Advisors and others who work with Greek Life across the nation.
**************************
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:49:06 -0500
From: "Dan Wrona" <dan@rise.cc>
Subject: Re: Undeclared
I must vent about some of the responses to the "Undeclared" episode, but please understand that my thoughts are not unique to this example. They are a result of the frustration I feel each time something is published about fraternities and sororities. Also please note that this is in reference to many examples and individuals, but not to any specific example or individual. And please pardon the sarcasm.
I watched the episode. My thoughts? - They painted a very accurate picture of the undergraduate interfraternal world today. I watched the entire episode very carefully, picking up on all the little innuendoes they included. There was NOTHING in the episode that I have not seen firsthand before. NOTHING was blown out of proportion. NOTHING was an inaccurate portrayal of what exists in reality. Based on my experience, it could very easily have been 'based on a true story'.
Yet our response is to tell Fox that we don't like what they said? "Please stop using the truth on TV, it makes us look bad." And we use this same
response over and over in every controversial public portrayal of us! Time to find a new way to approach the issue? I think so.
Here's one of many thoughts: I wonder if, because this is our profession, we immediately resort to whining and taking offense to everything that is
put on TV out of fear that it will be/is negative? Are we just overly sensitive? Why don't we like it when light fun is poked at us about our corny songs and our odd ceremonies? Sounds like nsecurity to me - again, are we ashamed of the truth?
Another...Can't we dig deeper into these things and use them as an educational tool about how to approach the real problem? It's a common
maxim, only when you recognize and admit your faults / shortcomings / weaknesses, can you improve on them. In the instance of "Undeclared", they point us to some interesting questions. One: Is the struggle of maintaining friendships outside of our organizations a natural phenomena, or is it
'bad'? I'm not sure, but if it IS something we want to not happen, how can we prepare our members to prevent it? Two: Why did they choose to use
'personal tasks' as their example of hazing? Perhaps because it seems to be the most common form of hazing currently. Does this aspect need some extra attention? Do we need to stop saying 'don't haze' and start talking about how respect is earned naturally?
When will we stop acting like our undergraduate members, grow up, and be a little bit smarter about things? "Hey, they said something about us. They must not like us. They're attacking us! We have to fight back! C'mon, everybody, Let's go!" Sound familiar? Sound absurd? (I'm curious - Is
this a natural fraternal instinct that we create in ourselves in response to untrusted outsiders? Never mind. Enough for now.)
Shots can be fired back at me directly.
Dan
*************************************
Daniel J. Wrona
Co-Founder
RISE Consulting
PO Box 713
Northville, MI 48167
voice mail: (248) 349-5274
cell/work: (716) 474-8967
dan@rise.cc
www.rise.cc
*************************************
"Life is not tried it is merely survived if you're
standing outside the fire." ~Garth Brooks
*************************************