» GC Stats |
Members: 326,163
Threads: 115,593
Posts: 2,200,725
|
Welcome to our newest member, MysteryMuse |
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 01:20 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Prescribing at all is arguably overprescribing if we are talking about a 4 year old, for example.
Prescribing at all is arguably overprescribing if we are talking about adults and children who may not have the conditions that they have been diagnosed with.
|
I agree, but look at what PiKA2001 said, which is what I was responding to:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001
Generally speaking I think it's ridiculous how people are so eager to take a pill to supposedly solve their (non) problems. Aren't they saying that 60% of kids have ADD now? I'm waiting for the day they start putting Ritalin in the water supply along side fluoride (which by the way is being blamed by some for causing health problems. You apply fluoride, you dont ingest it). I suffer from depression and I've yet to take any anti-depressants or any other mind altering chemicals to "fix" me.
|
The underlying message here is that any medication in and of itself is bad, whether needed or not. There is also the underlying message that AD(H)D may be a non-problem. Sure, too many people label some kids as having it without any basis, but that doesn't mean that some kids actually do deal with it and are sometimes significantly affected by it.
I think it's great when anyone can manage AD(H)D, depression or other issues without any medications. I truly do. And when possible, I think that should be the goal. But some people can't do that, either in the long-term or in the short term while they develop other strategies for dealing.
I will readily agree that overprescribing -- prescribing medicines for children or adults who don't need them -- is a wrong and is a problem. But I think it is equally wrong and problematic to under-prescribe -- to not provide medicines that are needed and are helpful.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|
12-03-2011, 02:16 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
The underlying message here is that any medication in and of itself is bad, whether needed or not. There is also the underlying message that AD(H)D may be a non-problem. Sure, too many people label some kids as having it without any basis, but that doesn't mean that some kids actually do deal with it and are sometimes significantly affected by it.
I think it's great when anyone can manage AD(H)D, depression or other issues without any medications. I truly do. And when possible, I think that should be the goal. But some people can't do that, either in the long-term or in the short term while they develop other strategies for dealing.
I will readily agree that overprescribing -- prescribing medicines for children or adults who don't need them -- is a wrong and is a problem. But I think it is equally wrong and problematic to under-prescribe -- to not provide medicines that are needed and are helpful.
|
No, thats not what I'm saying at all. If you have high cholesterol there's nothing wrong with taking medication to lower it but a doctor isn't going to prescribe meds there because he thinks you may or has a hunch that you have high cholesterol. He's going to actually draw blood and test the level of lipids or whatever it is they check. I feel the attitude is completely different when it comes to psychological disorders especially when your family practitioner or care provider might only have 5-10 minutes for diagnosing and coming up with treatment plans for the patient.
I'm also not saying that ADD or ADHD is a non issue but I do believe it's over diagnosed and over exposed and someone putting their kid on meds for it just because he goes nuts after slamming a Mt. Dew is absurd.
|
12-03-2011, 02:50 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 472
|
|
^^^Not to take this off track, but a child who truly has ADD and ADHD would actually focus better if given a Mountain Dew. ADD and ADHD drugs are stimulants (that normally begin in very low dosages). When we had kids who were on meds for ADD or ADHD and forgot to take them, we'd give them 1/2 a Mountain Dew. Isn't the same effect obviously, but it helped them get through.
Other than that - everything MysticCat said - ditto.
Last edited by AXOmom; 12-03-2011 at 03:53 PM.
|
12-03-2011, 04:16 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001
No, thats not what I'm saying at all. If you have high cholesterol there's nothing wrong with taking medication to lower it but a doctor isn't going to prescribe meds there because he thinks you may or has a hunch that you have high cholesterol. He's going to actually draw blood and test the level of lipids or whatever it is they check. I feel the attitude is completely different when it comes to psychological disorders especially when your family practitioner or care provider might only have 5-10 minutes for diagnosing and coming up with treatment plans for the patient.
I'm also not saying that ADD or ADHD is a non issue but I do believe it's over diagnosed and over exposed and someone putting their kid on meds for it just because he goes nuts after slamming a Mt. Dew is absurd.
|
My sincere apologies for reading more into your post than you intended. I see what you're saying, and don't really disagree. I noted above that we had a few days of testing, and reports from numerous sources, that the psychologist conducted and reviewed before providing a diagnosis. I think that's how it should work, and I would also have a problem with either a diagnosis or a prescription based on a a 10 minute session and anecdotal evidence.
And ditto what AXOMom said -- we've found that a Diet Mt. Dew or Coke can very helpful. (You get the caffeine without the sugar that way.) And now son has discovered coffee.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|
12-03-2011, 06:18 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,597
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by christiangirl
I wanted to touch on this, too. We (my co-workers and I back when I had a full case load) are trained "therapists" who offer "therapeutic dialogue" (i.e., talk to our patients using some of our skills) but it's hospital policy that we don't provide "therapy." While I agree that therapy would be a much better help then meds in like 90% percent of cases (if not more), providing it in a hospital setting really isn't feasible. Being in a hospital is meant to be short-term stabilization for about 3-7 days, at least here. That's not a fast rule, just an average. I can do some brief, crisis-centered therapy with that but that leaves very little time for any real work. Therapy is a process that pulls out a lot of hurtful stuff then gives tools to heal it back up again. I keep trying to explain to patients' families (who are livid that we don't provide therapy), "Would you want to be responsible for ripping off a person's mask and exposing all the hurtful things inside of them then ship them back into the world before teaching them how to pull it back together?" The thing that would be most helpful is something that needs to be done outside the hospital which is why we will give a referral for an outpatient therapist to anyone who says they want to go. I hope that makes sense--I wish we could do more than that but that could lead to some dangerous situations.
|
Yes, that is how it is now. When I started in the field as an Occupational Therapist in 1988, adults stayed in inpatient for about 6 weeks and adolescents and children could be as long as 3 months. That's weeks of daily group therapy, two hours of OT, two hours of Recreational Therapy, time with a teacher to do their schoolwork (for kids), daily individual sessions and family sessions a couple times a week. There was time to really work with them and to get medication levels right. And, the revolving door syndrome didn't happen. When it got down to 3-5 day lengths of stays and we'd see the same bi-polar patient 8 times a year, I was done with adult inpatient. Medicate them, push them out the door without giving them any skills to cope with their new situation (and sometimes no way of getting more meds), and they are back in 6 weeks. Occupational Therapy involves teaching life skills, working through activity to improve functioning, relaxation skills, self esteem building activities, expressive therapies, activities of daily living, etc. In the old days, we had time to teach them how to use the bus system, where to find healthy activities to do, how to fill out job applications, how to work in a group. You can't do that in 3-5 days. You can't do that once a week for an hour. Back then, once deemed fairly stable, a patient would go on a day pass to home to see how things were when they were at home. Then they'd come back to the hospital and work through issues that had come up. Then they'd go on a two day passes over a weekend and come back to process. THEN they'd go on a weekend pass, overnight, and do the same and if all went well on the weekend pass, they would be discharged. THERAPY happened, people got better.. the statistics showed it. Readmission rates were very, very low. They did start up day treatment programs after inpatient became so short, but those got shorter and shorter too. And you had no control over what patients were doing at home every night so they often did things that ended up sabotaging all the work you did during the day.
It was very different and it was very successful. And nobody wanted to pay for it.
Honestly folks, the way insurances set critical pathways now, they tell the doctor to do a minimal amount of screening and then try a medication to see if it works. That is the standard pathway they are supposed to follow so they don't spend too much on tests.
Our society is so messed up, it's depressing to me. I'm a little passionate about this topic, as you can probably tell...lol.
|
12-03-2011, 06:33 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Mountain Dew is the best soda. That's all.
|
12-03-2011, 08:54 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,137
|
|
Just so everyone knows, my post is not me saying that no one has a legitimate psych diganosis. There are some kids who have legitimate psych issues. However, I feel like when you're dealing with a child, you need to first be trying manage the condition with therapy, diet changes, maybe some help from the Behavior Specialist at school (to try and curtail the behavior.) I have a serious issue with people diagnosing a child with ADHD then having their FIRST action be to put them on a pill.
__________________
"Remember that apathy has no place in our Sorority." - Kelly Jo Karnes, Pi
Lakers Nation.
|
12-05-2011, 07:17 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in the midst of a 90s playlist
Posts: 9,816
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee
Yes, that is how it is now...
|
I heart you. You just described what I wish inpatient treatment looked like. I forget that once upon a time, it did.
__________________
"We have letters. You have dreams." ~Senusret I
"My dreams have become letters." ~christiangirl
|
12-06-2011, 04:52 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
My sincere apologies for reading more into your post than you intended. I see what you're saying, and don't really disagree. I noted above that we had a few days of testing, and reports from numerous sources, that the psychologist conducted and reviewed before providing a diagnosis. I think that's how it should work, and I would also have a problem with either a diagnosis or a prescription based on a a 10 minute session and anecdotal evidence.
And ditto what AXOMom said -- we've found that a Diet Mt. Dew or Coke can very helpful. (You get the caffeine without the sugar that way.) And now son has discovered coffee.
|
No worries. Unfortunately many children aren't in the situation that yours is in with parents or guardians that can afford to or care enough to take them to specialists/get second opinions, etc.
|
01-20-2012, 03:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
|
I wonder to what extent this coincides with both malpractice pressures (in my experience, a misdiagnosis via the wrong assigned malady is much less problematic for juries than a non-diagnosis, or inaction), and the changing view of doctor as solution, rather than as an aid in management/prevention.
In short, are doctors themselves thinking they 'should' be diagnosing more, leading to overdiagnosis?
|
01-20-2012, 07:20 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
I wonder to what extent this coincides with both malpractice pressures (in my experience, a misdiagnosis via the wrong assigned malady is much less problematic for juries than a non-diagnosis, or inaction), and the changing view of doctor as solution, rather than as an aid in management/prevention.
In short, are doctors themselves thinking they 'should' be diagnosing more, leading to overdiagnosis?
|
Excellent question.
I know that it is difficult to come across children (and people) who do not have some diagnosis or some prescription for something.
I think that is doctors overdiagnosing combined with the booming prescription drug industry and combined with parents thinking that their child has every illness under the sun.
|
01-20-2012, 08:36 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 2,714
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Excellent question.
I know that it is difficult to come across children (and people) who do not have some diagnosis or some prescription for something.
I think that is doctors overdiagnosing combined with the booming prescription drug industry and combined with parents thinking that their child has every illness under the sun.
|
I agree.
On the other hand, I have noticed that some parents are resistant to having their children checked out because of the overdiagnosing. I have noticed this with parents of my friends and with my friends becoming parents. Since so many children, or the parents themselves, are (were) being so overdiagnosed they resist taking their children to be diagnosed even when they have problems. Some of my friends will not listen to their doctor (or doctors) when it comes to potential health issues with children. I am all for getting a second opinion, in fact I'd strongly recommend it at times. One friend who is currently pregnant child 2, refuses to take advice from her doctor even though she almost lost child 1 due to complications that most likely could have been avoided if she had taken the doctors advice. She refused to allow her first child to take antibiotics when the baby had an infection. This was until the baby's father and the grandmother basically forced her.
I realize that many people are more interested in taking a pill to fix all. I do wonder, however, how far the resistance goes.
__________________
KΔ ♥ AOT
"Sisterhood is not about being popular, its about developing character, forming bonds, and self-discovery. If after four years you can hold you head high, then absolutely your sorority is "tops"." - H2oot
|
01-21-2012, 03:53 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in the midst of a 90s playlist
Posts: 9,816
|
|
What I'm wondering is if it's now seen as better to label someone with a problem they don't have than later find out you missed something. Theoretically, it might be easier to defend oneself in a malpractice suit if one can say "Oh, I gave the wrong diagnosis but at least I took action and was sort of on the right track" then to say "Yes, the patient came to me for help prior to [insert catastrophe here] and I completely missed this." I think it used to be (and to an extent still is the case) that doctors were afraid of diagnosing someone when they did not have to because of the stigma surrounding mental health diagnoses and the effect that label could have on a person's life. However, this concern has taken a backseat to a number of factors including fear of not getting paid by insurance companies.
__________________
"We have letters. You have dreams." ~Senusret I
"My dreams have become letters." ~christiangirl
|
01-21-2012, 09:30 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,634
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001
No, thats not what I'm saying at all. If you have high cholesterol there's nothing wrong with taking medication to lower it but a doctor isn't going to prescribe meds there because he thinks you may or has a hunch that you have high cholesterol. He's going to actually draw blood and test the level of lipids or whatever it is they check. I feel the attitude is completely different when it comes to psychological disorders especially when your family practitioner or care provider might only have 5-10 minutes for diagnosing and coming up with treatment plans for the patient.
I'm also not saying that ADD or ADHD is a non issue but I do believe it's over diagnosed and over exposed and someone putting their kid on meds for it just because he goes nuts after slamming a Mt. Dew is absurd.
|
You'd be surprised.
__________________
AOII
One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|