The 2008 presidential field at-a-glance

[a.e.B.O.T.]

Any thoughts of Clinton's Assassination comments... So, yes, I don't think she meant that she is staying the race, hoping Obama gets assassinated, but how could she not realize how distasteful she sounded? I don't really get it...

Oh, I think that supreme court is a bit of a stretch. Oh, and it has to be approved by Congress, and I don't think she will get far. Political Celebrities are kept away from the SCOTUS as to not draw unnecessary attention.

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.

Any thoughts of Clinton's Assassination comments... So, yes, I don't think she meant that she is staying the race, hoping Obama gets assassinated, but how could she not realize how distasteful she sounded? I don't really get it...

Oh, I think that supreme court is a bit of a stretch. Oh, and it has to be approved by Congress, and I don't think she will get far. Political Celebrities are kept away from the SCOTUS as to not draw unnecessary attention.

I think it was a terrible choice of words, especially when made during a week when Senator Kennedy's health problems have hit the news. I think that Hilary is frustrated and let something slip.

Back on the SCOTUS point - my biggest issue is that there are a whole lot of others who are more qualified than her for the next open spot. I know she worked with the House Committee on the Judiciary during Watergate, but if I remember, she doesn't have any other legal experience on the federal level, and wasn't an appellate advocate of any distinction. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me on those points.

I know that there have been previous cases (Lewis Powell for one) of people being elevated to the Court with little to no judicial or appellate advocacy experience. However, with the level of scrutiny given to SCOTUS nominees these days, I think it would be nearly impossible for such a nominee to be confirmed today.

Plus, the conservatives still upset about Bork would have a field day with a Hilary nomination process.

[a.e.B.O.T.]

All this talk about making Clinton VP or giving her the SCOTUS spot makes it seem like Obama OWES Clinton.

He does not owe her anything at all, and likewise for her if she had clinched the Democratic Nomination. They were just candidates, won wins, one loses. There is no tie or consolation prizes needed.

[AGDee]

Her refusal to drop out of the race by now is hurting her in so many ways. I can't imagine the Dems are too happy with her at this point. I have a lot more respect for someone who bows out with dignity than who continues to fight a losing battle in this manner. And, this is from someone who actually liked her at one point.(not over Edwards, but over Obama.. before)

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.

Any thoughts of Clinton's Assassination comments... So, yes, I don't think she meant that she is staying the race, hoping Obama gets assassinated, but how could she not realize how distasteful she sounded? I don't really get it...

Oh, I think that supreme court is a bit of a stretch. Oh, and it has to be approved by Congress, and I don't think she will get far. Political Celebrities are kept away from the SCOTUS as to not draw unnecessary attention.

If RFK Jr. does not have any problems with the comment, and he seems not too from what he said, should anyone else?

[a.e.B.O.T.]

Originally Posted by jon1856

If RFK Jr. does not have any problems with the comment, and he seems not too from what he said, should anyone else?

yes, because we are all entitled to our opinions, which is the greatest thing, and most harmful thing about this country. However, it is what this country is.

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.

yes, because we are all entitled to our opinions, which is the greatest thing, and most harmful thing about this country. However, it is what this country is.

I agree with you
I saw/heard all thes "talking heads" say how bad her comments were and then saw RFK Jr's comments.
In the larger scope of things, just who's POV should carry the most weight?
And whose seems to be?

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by jon1856

If RFK Jr. does not have any problems with the comment, and he seems not too from what he said, should anyone else?

I've found, mostly through my past journalism experience, that what someone says publicly isn't necessarily how they feel privately. Considering what the Kennedy family has been through over the past week, I would guess that RFK Jr. was "rising above the fray," so to speak.

Plus, I think the criticism of Hilary is more representative of a larger issue, a feeling of of a lack of respect of the party on the part of the Clintons. It goes back to criticisms that Bill Clinton didn't support the party enough in his presidency, and Hilary's staying in the race just adds to the feeling that the Clintons aren't team players.

I personally don't care all that much - I'm not a big fan of either Hilary or Obama, and I just see her comments as an extremely poor use of judgment. It's not determinative for me, though, by any means.