GreekChat.com Forums
Celebrating 25 Years of GreekChat!

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Tau > Tau Kappa Epsilon
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 326,150
Threads: 115,590
Posts: 2,200,378
Welcome to our newest member, sdcnyth
» Online Users: 1,191
1 members and 1,190 guests
aidntexaxdz8175
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2014, 01:50 PM
TKEmanKM TKEmanKM is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 31
Send a message via AIM to TKEmanKM Send a message via Yahoo to TKEmanKM
Closing chapters/revitalizing chapters

Fraters,
I know we have gone though a great many trials with staff being moved around so much and going through CEO's like Voldemort cursed the Dark Arts position, but I come from a recently closed chapter, who had a high amount of debt, low numbers, and little hope. We had a few alumni fraters who were willing to help and even more older (60's and70's) alumni who wanted to see some sort of results before they would commit any resources to the fledgling chapter. Now I have been on the "regional" volunteer side so I know a bit about what goes on at the OGC and I respect them highly, and count many a staff member among my personal friends.

That being said working in greek life professionally now for a number of years, I have seen many other fraternities who send their professional personnel out for more than a week + where TKE tends to send people out for only a few hours.

Ideally the volunteer staff (GPA, PA) would be able to pick up the ball and run with it but I am wondering why we as a fraternity tend to spend time and money in places where it realistically isn't needed (large chapters, financially solvent chapters, chapters who need no assistance in recruiting, etc) and why we do not tend to assist the chapters that could use the most help by having a staff man there to ensure success. It was my experience that I could only help so many of my men in my professional capacity where a staff man who could keep them on the ball, make sure policies are followed, and generally assist chapters in making sure they survive and thrive instead of die and get closed.

I will mention that I was the professional university person who agreed with my home chapter's closing, only because it was the absolute last option we had, they had been given a number of chances and failed to capitalize on those chances given, however I do believe that if someone on the professional staff had been there for more than just a pep talk I think we could have done more.

Overall I see this as a failure on all sides more so the active chapter and alumni who could have stepped in and done more, but also on the part of the professionals because it seems as if we only care about big donors and large chapters.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2014, 08:25 AM
TKEmanKM TKEmanKM is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 31
Send a message via AIM to TKEmanKM Send a message via Yahoo to TKEmanKM
I guess what I am really asking is should we go to another model where lower performing chapters get a longer visitation where all concerned parties ( chapter, staff, volunteers, and alumni) work together to ensure viability? As far as I know, this does not happen very often where all available resources are brought in except in a reopening or expansion case.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2014, 12:42 AM
AnchorAlumna AnchorAlumna is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Old South
Posts: 2,938
It has certainly worked for our sorority.
But you have to remember....that one professional is going to HAVE to move on, sooner or later. It's got to come from the local members. They're the ones who will be there now and several years from now.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-16-2014, 09:43 AM
TKEmanKM TKEmanKM is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 31
Send a message via AIM to TKEmanKM Send a message via Yahoo to TKEmanKM
Oh that I understand. As I said I believe that there needs to be a high amount of collaboration among staff, volunteers, and alumni to ensure viability. What I am noticing is that many of the "more successful" chapters that I have worked with from other organizations have staff members that stay longer than just a day. I am not saying that success is correlated by a long visitation, but I do believe that it helps. I know we do what we can, I am just wondering if there is an aspect that we can change to ensure growth and viability.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:54 PM
FSUZeta FSUZeta is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: naples, florida
Posts: 18,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnchorAlumna View Post
It has certainly worked for our sorority.
But you have to remember....that one professional is going to HAVE to move on, sooner or later. It's got to come from the local members. They're the ones who will be there now and several years from now.
^I agree with my panhellenic sister^

While the desire to change the direction the chapter is headed ultimately lies with the current chapter members, often traveling leadership consultants (TLCs) can help get the chapter started in the right direction. They typically stay for a couple of days to a couple of weeks and then are a ready source of contact via email or phone conversations after the visit is over. I have often wondered why fraternities don't model traveling graduate member programs after the NPC sororities programs-we seem to have it down pat. Not that we never have to close a chapter-but I do feel that with intervention from IO, those closures are significantly less than they would be otherwise. I don't see how problems that could lead to a chapter's closure could be addressed and remedied in a few hours.
__________________
I live in Fantasyland and I have waterfront property.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-29-2015, 06:00 PM
Cheerio Cheerio is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Forward, Together Forward
Posts: 5,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by FSUZeta View Post
^I agree with my panhellenic sister^

While the desire to change the direction the chapter is headed ultimately lies with the current chapter members, often traveling leadership consultants (TLCs) can help get the chapter started in the right direction. They typically stay for a couple of days to a couple of weeks and then are a ready source of contact via email or phone conversations after the visit is over. I have often wondered why fraternities don't model traveling graduate member programs after the NPC sororities programs-we seem to have it down pat. Not that we never have to close a chapter-but I do feel that with intervention from IO, those closures are significantly less than they would be otherwise. I don't see how problems that could lead to a chapter's closure could be addressed and remedied in a few hours.
bumping
__________________
I'm the only man with a Dallas Cowboys Super Bowl ring that doesn't wear it. I'm a Green Bay Packer.
Herb Adderley, co-founder, Sigma Chapter of Omega Psi Phi @ Michigan State University

It's only words, and words are all I have to take your heart away.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2015, 01:01 PM
TKEmanKM TKEmanKM is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 31
Send a message via AIM to TKEmanKM Send a message via Yahoo to TKEmanKM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FSUZeta View Post
^I agree with my panhellenic sister^

While the desire to change the direction the chapter is headed ultimately lies with the current chapter members, often traveling leadership consultants (TLCs) can help get the chapter started in the right direction. They typically stay for a couple of days to a couple of weeks and then are a ready source of contact via email or phone conversations after the visit is over. I have often wondered why fraternities don't model traveling graduate member programs after the NPC sororities programs-we seem to have it down pat. Not that we never have to close a chapter-but I do feel that with intervention from IO, those closures are significantly less than they would be otherwise. I don't see how problems that could lead to a chapter's closure could be addressed and remedied in a few hours.
I agree with your assessment. There are many things that Panhellenic does that NIC Fraternities could do, albeit that they would have to be adapted for men's groups. There are many chapters, not even in my organization that if they were healthy and vibrant would contribute to the overall health of the Fraternity and Sorority community but those chapters can't do that if all they are worried about is their survival.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
International Council announces the closing of Delta Xi and Theta Rho chapters Unregistered- Alpha Gamma Delta 5 05-25-2005 10:19 PM
Closing chapters too much IUPChapAdvisor Delta Sigma Phi 6 12-10-2004 12:19 PM
national chapters vs local chapters Panhellpres Greek Life 1 08-17-2003 08:47 PM
chapters that are closing/opening PhiMuLady150 Phi Mu 23 07-11-2003 12:49 PM
Small chapters/Large chapters AngelPhiSig Greek Life 5 07-17-2001 12:45 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.