The Rules According to a Fraternity "Cocksman"

[SOM]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

I took him to mean it would seem out of character for Kappa Sig HQ to be engaging in a cover-up rather than taking action.

I agree with you MysticCat.

I would be willing to take it even farther and say that it would be out of character for just about any National Office/HQ to engage in some sort of a cover-up.

However, in a general sense, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that people or officials bellow the National office level to behave differently.

Like to add something else here. Most of the people I have spoken to about this agree on the following:
It is important to find out just what happened here.
But at this point, the larger picture is not about who, what, where, how and why of this e-mail.

What may be more important is how it now paints Greeks once again in a rather poor light.

I certainly would not and do not wish any of my younger women relatives, now in college, to be looked at, thought of or used in the ways mentioned in e-mail.

I would not want any of my Brothers involved in anything like the actives mentioned in e-mail.

Yet now, no matter which GLO one is in, others will think about letter and you.

It is rather upsetting, at the very least, that it is relatively easy to find bad things about Greek life.

And rather hard to find news about positive aspects of it.

And if this whole issue is phony, it just added into the above.

[agzg]

Originally Posted by SOM

I agree with you MysticCat.

I would be willing to take it even farther and say that it would be out of character for just about any National Office/HQ to engage in some sort of a cover-up.

However, in a general sense, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that people or officials bellow the National office level to behave differently.

Like to add something else here. Most of the people I have spoken to about this agree on the following:
It is important to find out just what happened here.
But at this point, the larger picture is not about who, what, where, how and why of this e-mail.

What may be more important is how it now paints Greeks once again in a rather poor light.

I certainly would not and do not wish any of my younger women relatives, now in college, to be looked at, thought of or used in the ways mentioned in e-mail.

I would not want any of my Brothers involved in anything like the actives mentioned in e-mail.

Yet now, no matter which GLO one is in, others will think about letter and you.

It is rather upsetting, at the very least, that it is relatively easy to find bad things about Greek life.

And rather hard to find news about positive aspects of it.

And if this whole issue is phony, it just added into the above.

I'm less concerned with how it paints Greeks in a negative light than how it speaks to a culture where someone, somewhere thought this would be an acceptable way to describe women. While it may or may not be phony and an attempt to paint Greeks in a negative light - what is it that makes it even plausible that a fraternity man would have written this?

[Ghostwriter]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

I took him to mean it would seem out of character for Kappa Sig HQ to be engaging in a cover-up rather than taking action.

^^This. Thanks MC. To the rescue again and I appreciate it!

Mic Wilson has a long history of NOT putting his neck out for the undergrads and the various chapters. It is normally the DGM's and Area Manager's who do the initial investigatory research when these type RM issues arise. One of them maybe would cover it up if they are truly stupid but not the Executive Director. I seriously doubt he has ever been in a meeting with the writer at Jezebel. It just doesn't seem in character with the way things are handled in our organization. However, I will hold out the caveat that I could be completely wrong.