Information on HBGLOs - Page 6

DSTCHAOS · #76 04-01-2005, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by starang21

uuhhhhh.....someone point me to what the fuck he's talking about.

He doesn't even know.

Tom Earp · #77 04-01-2005, 12:51 AM

sigmadiva,

that is a Post that can be taken to heart and understood.

But, it is not only relegated to the Divine 9 but to all Greek Social Organizations.

True?

DSTCHAOS · #78 04-01-2005, 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RACooper
This is exactly the type of stuff I was looking for

Good.

Taualumna · #79 04-01-2005, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DSTCHAOS
You don't have to.

Why not? Some NPHC-ers seem to want to know about NPCs.

starang21 · #80 04-01-2005, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taualumna
I agree with RA. Those of us in non-NPHC GLOs really don't understand why everything is so private. NPCs and NICs are so much more open. We'd like to understand why NPHC members are the way they are. Right now we don't. Also, many of us just don't KNOW that many NPHC members because there may be few or no chapters in our area.

my organization is secretive because we choose to be. nothing more nothing less. you guys being open is your own prerogative. i don't understand why people are so nosy.

DSTCHAOS · #81 04-01-2005, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taualumna
Why not? Some NPHC-ers seem to want to know about NPCs.

If you didn't want to divulge the info, many of us wouldn't keep pushing the issue.

DSTCHAOS · #82 04-01-2005, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by starang21
obviously that's what he's talking about, you simple fuck. i'm asking you to point out in this thread where it's at.

Nooooo, we're going to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he meant Black economics. Black economics are ALL OVER this thread.

Get it?

starang21 · #83 04-01-2005, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DSTCHAOS
Nooooo, we're going to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he meant Black economics. Black economics are ALL OVER this thread.

Get it?

hi.

lifesaver · #84 04-01-2005, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sigmadiva
A few years ago, there was this vindictive (?sp) web site that supposedly revealed all of the secrets of Chi Omega. Yeah, I read it and I know what the five (or six) greek letters symbolize in their badge. I also remember the significance of some of their symbols and I read details of their rituals. It was interesting information to read, but really it all has no significant meaning to me because I am not a Chi O.

The decisions of why we do things in our org and what they mean are FOR MEMBERS ONLY and not the public. I would hope that many of you would understand that by now.

You completely contradict yourself in this post. You say that why we do things in our org and what they mean are FOR MEMBERS ONLY and not the public. Yet you publically admit that you read what was allegedly another orgs. secrets.

So the whole FOR MEMBERS ONLY thing only counts when its someone else wanting to know about a group, but its ok for you to know about another?

starang21 · #85 04-01-2005, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lifesaver
You completely contradict yourself in this post. You say that why we do things in our org and what they mean are FOR MEMBERS ONLY and not the public. Yet you publically admit that you read what was allegedly another orgs. secrets. So the whole FOR MEMBERS ONLY thing only counts when its someone else wanting to know about a group, but its ok for you to know about another?

i assume you didn't read the part about someone else putting the information on the web. in no way does her discretion have ANYTHING to do with whatever someone else wants to do with their lack thereof. if you all weren't so open and indiscrete about your secrets and/or processes, then stuff like this wouldn't happen.

it's not her fault that SOMEONE ELSE put another org's secrets on the web. i don't think she was being all nosy and asking for it. the information was already PROVIDED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC BY A THIRD PARTY. so i'm lost as to where you're not getting it.

and what the hell does she knowing about someone else's org have to do with you know about hers? they're not the same thing.

RACooper · #86 04-01-2005, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by starang21
i assume you didn't read the part about someone else putting the information on the web. in no way does her discretion have ANYTHING to do with whatever someone else wants to do with their lack thereof. if you all weren't so open and indiscrete about your secrets and/or processes, then stuff like this wouldn't happen.

Sorry your post makes no sense really... who are you talking about be so open and indiscrete???

starang21 · #87 04-01-2005, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RACooper

Sorry your post makes no sense really... who are you talking about be so open and indiscrete???

it's not difficult, use simple logic.

the orgnization that had their secrets put on blast.

RACooper · #88 04-01-2005, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by starang21
it's not difficult, use simple logic.

the orgnization that had their secrets put on blast.

So one former member that posts the information is indicative of a systemic lack of concern about secrecy in your mind?

starang21 · #89 04-01-2005, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RACooper
So one former member that posts the information is indicative of a systemic lack of concern about secrecy in your mind?

not always, but the fact that that former member lacked discretion means we have to. focus on the rest of the post.

and don't pretend that people not in the nphc are more open with their processes and other esoteric information that would be privy to members had it been mine. this site is evidenced of that.

RACooper · #90 04-01-2005, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by starang21
not always, but the fact that that former member lacked discretion means we have to. focus on the rest of the post.

and don't pretend that people not in the nphc are more open with their processes and other esoteric information that would be privy to members had it been mine. this site is evidenced of that.

Again... you've lost me...

lifesaver was extolling the poster to exercise discretion in not revealing anything they may have learned, and lamenting their lack of respect for another org's secrets...

As for non-NPHC orgs being more open with their secret... I think you're a little off the mark - there are different levels of secrecy and knowledge, what someone sees on the outside is not an indication of the secrets they learn when they have taken the oaths... there are many things that can be discussed with those on the outside - but many more that are known only to those within.