» GC Stats |
Members: 329,748
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,164
|
Welcome to our newest member, Alberttus |
|
 |
|

03-31-2010, 09:28 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater New York
Posts: 4,537
|
|
Having the older kid give up his room is just asking for trouble.
__________________
Love Conquers All
|

03-31-2010, 09:39 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooh La La
Where I live--Virginia, the only time the death penalty may be pursued is when a "capital offense" occurs.
|
A capital offense by definition is an offense for which the death penalty (aka capital punsihment, from the Latin capitus, head, as in "off with") can be imposed. Just sayin'.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|

03-31-2010, 10:14 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pink Platoon
Posts: 232
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by christiangirl
I don't know the whole story, but that's what I was thinking.
Honestly, I don't think he should be tried as an adult because he does not have the mental capability of an adult. However, even at 11 kids know that a) killing is wrong and b) you apologize when you do wrong. It's been a year and he's still showing no remorse for having taken 2 lives? There's more going on here than just immaturity. Have any psych assessments been done on this kid?
|
Remorse for what? He's trying to get off, if he shows 'remorse' isn't that a hint at guilt? How would that help his defense?
__________________
Stupidity is a disease, kill yourself before it spreads.
|

03-31-2010, 10:32 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prettyface08
Remorse for what? He's trying to get off, if he shows 'remorse' isn't that a hint at guilt? How would that help his defense?
|
If what I'm gathering is correct, and the real issue is that he demonstrates no sorrow that the father's fiancée and her unborn child are dead rather than feeling no remorse for killing them, then we seem to have a word-usage problem. The media uses the word "remorse," but remorse means sorrow for one's own wrongdoing. You don't feel remorse for something someone else did; you feel sorrow, sadness or the like.
Like you said, he's pleading not guilty -- a right guaranteed him by the Constitution. Why would he be expected to show remorse for something that he says he didn't do and that the government hasn't yet proven in court that he did do?
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|

03-31-2010, 10:38 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater New York
Posts: 4,537
|
|
^^^^
Right, and I think the answer might be, because it's the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
__________________
Love Conquers All
|

03-31-2010, 10:42 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pink Platoon
Posts: 232
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
If what I'm gathering is correct, and the real issue is that he demonstrates no sorrow that the father's fiancée and her unborn child are dead rather than feeling no remorse for killing them, then we seem to have a word-usage problem. The media uses the word "remorse," but remorse means sorrow for one's own wrongdoing. You don't feel remorse for something someone else did; you feel sorrow, sadness or the like.
Like you said, he's pleading not guilty -- a right guaranteed him by the Constitution. Why would he be expected to show remorse for something that he says he didn't do and that the government hasn't yet proven in court that he did do?
|
Right. What if he really didn't do it, but still doesn't feel sorrow for their deaths? Not saying that it's right or that it doesn't mean that he may have deeper issues, but will they punish him because he doesn't feel bad that they are dead? They have already established that he didn't like her or the idea of having a new baby sibling, maybe he just doesn't care.
__________________
Stupidity is a disease, kill yourself before it spreads.
|

03-31-2010, 10:42 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
A capital offense by definition is an offense for which the death penalty (aka capital punsihment, from the Latin capitus, head, as in "off with") can be imposed. Just sayin'. 
|
 LOL
|

03-31-2010, 11:17 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,821
|
|
I keep reading these police accounts of what supposedly happened here and don't understand at all how they have so many details unless there was a witness. How can you say something like "He hid the gun under a blanket so the 7 year old wouldn't see it". So either, the police are making HUGE assumptions or this kid talked some or the 7 year old saw the whole thing?
In any case, there is a reason that 11 year olds are not considered adults. I said this with Nathanial Abraham (who was 11 when tried as an adult in Michigan) and I maintain the same opinion today. If they are adults, treat them like adults. If they are children, treat them like children. If they aren't old enough to vote or drive, don't be trying them as adults. How can we constantly be moving the bar of "adulthood" based on what's convenient at the time?
Last edited by AGDee; 03-31-2010 at 11:28 AM.
|

03-31-2010, 11:47 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hokie Nation
Posts: 172
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
A capital offense by definition is an offense for which the death penalty (aka capital punsihment, from the Latin capitus, head, as in "off with") can be imposed. Just sayin'. 
|
Thanks. I wasn't sure of the way it works in other states, like if anyone who commits first degree murder qualifies for death row.
|

03-31-2010, 11:51 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooh La La
Thanks. I wasn't sure of the way it works in other states, like if anyone who commits first degree murder qualifies for death row.
|
 This is a Wikipedia moment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment
|

03-31-2010, 11:59 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RU OX Alum
Having the older kid give up his room is just asking for trouble.
|
lol
__________________
Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm afraid of it.
|

03-31-2010, 12:25 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hokie Nation
Posts: 172
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by insaneclown
Mumia was not framed. Idiots like DaemonSeid think he was framed because they don't know any better. DaemonSeid was probably brainwashed at a young age by his 30 year old grandmother or his Jeremiah Wright type clergyman into believing that all blacks are innocent victims.
The reality is Mumia is a murderer. He was arrested at the scene of the crime. He had the gun. Mumia's gun was the murder weapon. Mumia had a bullet in him from the cop's gun. Mumia's brother was also at the scene and he said Mumia shot the cop. There car was at the scene. Mumia told people at the hospital that he hoped the cop died. There was not anyone else at the scene other than Mumia, his brother and the dead cop.
|
Excuse me, but guilt has not yet been determined. Even if Mumia did do it, your response is incredibly rude. Threads like this are supposed to encourage RESPECTFUL debate. Responding like this won't get anyone to listen to your opinion. Instead, you'll simply be discounted to a racist loon.
|

03-31-2010, 12:38 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooh La La
Excuse me, but guilt has not yet been determined. Even if Mumia did do it, your response is incredibly rude. Threads like this are supposed to encourage RESPECTFUL debate. Responding like this won't get anyone to listen to your opinion. Instead, you'll simply be discounted to a racist loon.
|
insaneclown = the constantly banned madmax
He logs on to try to be rude and disrespectful. Shame on you for actually reading his posts, let alone responding.
|

03-31-2010, 01:49 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Counting my blessings!
Posts: 31,416
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee
I keep reading these police accounts of what supposedly happened here and don't understand at all how they have so many details unless there was a witness. How can you say something like "He hid the gun under a blanket so the 7 year old wouldn't see it". So either, the police are making HUGE assumptions or this kid talked some or the 7 year old saw the whole thing?
In any case, there is a reason that 11 year olds are not considered adults. I said this with Nathanial Abraham (who was 11 when tried as an adult in Michigan) and I maintain the same opinion today. If they are adults, treat them like adults. If they are children, treat them like children. If they aren't old enough to vote or drive, don't be trying them as adults. How can we constantly be moving the bar of "adulthood" based on what's convenient at the time?
|
From what I've read, the seven year old was questioned by the police about what happened, and she was the one who said that her soon-to-be stepbrother had a blanket wrapped around something and told her that her mother wasn't making breakfast. He also didn't want the fiancee & her daughter moving in, let alone having a baby around. Throw in the fingerprint evidence, and it's going to take one fantastic attorney to use anything but his age to get this kid off.
As for remorse, guilty or not, psychiatric reports from both sides say that he has no remorse that the fiancee & the baby are dead.
I stand by my original statement that we need to have a halfway prison of sorts, for the hardcore juvenile offender. A kid who kills shouldn't be with truants, nor should a kid who kills be with adult offenders.
__________________
~ *~"ADPi"~*~
♥Proud to be a Macon Magnolia ♥
"He who is not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|