GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Recruitment

Recruitment General discussion about recruitment.

» GC Stats
Members: 329,736
Threads: 115,667
Posts: 2,205,067
Welcome to our newest member, True Blue #3
» Online Users: 1,590
0 members and 1,590 guests
No Members online
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-12-2001, 07:45 PM
cash78mere cash78mere is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NY
Posts: 1,198
Angry

Quote:
Originally posted by loviest95:
Well that is why I love my AKA!!
I am not even sure what would motivate brothers or sisters to go the WGLO way.
During my Freshman year at a redneck school in Texas (TAMU) my roommate was "rushing"
Delta Zeta. All they ever did was drink and party.
I knew that the BGLO tradition of community service was for me

It is just so amazing to me
WGLO's even let people outside of their brotherhood / sisterhood sport their letters...

AKA Pink and Green the Prettiest colors I have ever seen!!
SKEE-WEEE!!!!!!!!
You know, I am usually silent on these types of topics. But your IGNORANT, RIDICULOUS comments made me write.

If you have even read any of the posts that the "WGLO" members have written on similar topics, you would know that people outside of the sisterhood are NOT allowed to wear letters!!! NO ONE is allowed to wear them on a shirt. The only exception is on a "greek" t-shirt where all of the orgs, including the BGLO's, have their organization represented by their letters.

You chose, on your own, to go to that "redneck" school. No one forced you to go there. Maybe that one sorority at your backward university did not care about community service and sisterhood, but that does not represent every GLO. It is ignorance that would make you think that. At my school, we did tons of service and spent countless hours helping other people. Of course we had fun, but "drink and party" does not describe ALL that we did. Puh-leez.

You call other people your "brothers and sisters" but that criticize them for the personal decisions that they make. That is not very fraternal or loving of you in ANY WAY.

Don't try to downplay other people because of your own insecurities.

Please think when you make a blanket statement. Your comments focus more on what type of person YOU are, than how you percieve the GLO's at your school.

  #17  
Old 02-13-2001, 09:35 AM
12dn94dst 12dn94dst is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,431
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by cash78mere:
If you have even read any of the posts that the "WGLO" members have written on similar topics, you would know that people outside of the sisterhood are NOT allowed to wear letters!!! NO ONE is allowed to wear them on a shirt. The only exception is on a "greek" t-shirt where all of the orgs, including the BGLO's, have their organization represented by their letters.
I'm not sure what posts you're reading, but I've read SEVERAL posts on this board accounting to people wearing other organizations letters (ie "dropping," lavaliering, pinning, shirting). I DISTINCTLY remember one post that mentioned one of the MALE cast members of Real World 9 was wearing a SORORITY LETTERED T-SHIRT while he played basketball. The reason for this was it was "just for fun". HUH??? Cash78mere, while it may not be common for YOUR organization to allow others to wear letters, we (non-NPC,non-NIC members) have read on this very board that IT DOES HAPPEN. Just like you are not inclined to know the inner workings of the NPHC, we are not inclined to know the inner workings of the NPC or the NIC, THEREFORE the only thing we have to go by is what we see or read. SO, cash78mere, before you go off on someone & tell them to read the message boards, be sure YOU read them YOURSELF to make sure you have your facts straight.

Don't you EVER question the Brother & Sisterhood that members of the NPHC have INTER and INTRA-ORGANIZATIONALLY. If you're not IN IT, you WON'T UNDERSTAND.

peace out!
  #18  
Old 02-13-2001, 10:04 AM
Ideal08 Ideal08 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In a whole 'nother world
Posts: 5,283
Angry

Quote:
Originally posted by xp2k:
I'm with you AlphaChiGirl. I think Tragic2K is out of line dispelling ALL GLO's as being bad for minorities. True, you should look more in depth into something so serious as greek life but it is in poor taste to generalize ALL GLO's in ALL greek systems at ALL campuses. I happen to be a minority, close to my community and active in my fraternity.

And as for you AKAMonet, I've responded to one of your posts before. I wont go into the severe issues that you seem to have but I will say that your "those is who sell out/get the hell out" bit is not only inappropriate, but a little overdone. If you truly cared about our people, it wouldnt matter what GLO they joined as long as they had the same values and purposes to uplift the community.

Your negativeness truly makes me wonder whether or not you are even human.
I find it very ironic that you would call my soror's post "inappropriate" and then turn right around and disrespect her by making such an asinine statement as "Your negativeness truly makes me wonder whether or not you are even human." Is that not inappropriate??? I, for one, didn't appreciate it, and I'm sure my soror didn't appreciate it either. Please do not think that because you are a minority, you have the right to question our purposes and values in the community, or to even align them with your own. Yes, we all work to uplift the community, but I'm willing to bet that there's not a WGLO (and I use that term with no disrespect, it is not based on your current membership but the history of your orgs.) whose purpose aligns itself with that of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, INC. Or any other BGLO for that matter, however, I can only speak for AKA.

That being said, could you please tell me the amount of time that your GLO (not just xp2k, anyone can respond) spends in the African-American community? Since it doesn't "matter what GLO they joined as long as they had the same values and purposes to uplift the community."
  #19  
Old 02-13-2001, 10:09 AM
Ideal08 Ideal08 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In a whole 'nother world
Posts: 5,283
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by 12dn94dst:
I'm not sure what posts you're reading, but I've read SEVERAL posts on this board accounting to people wearing other organizations letters (ie "dropping," lavaliering, pinning, shirting). I DISTINCTLY remember one post that mentioned one of the MALE cast members of Real World 9 was wearing a SORORITY LETTERED T-SHIRT while he played basketball. The reason for this was it was "just for fun". HUH??? Cash78mere, while it may not be common for YOUR organization to allow others to wear letters, we (non-NPC,non-NIC members) have read on this very board that IT DOES HAPPEN. Just like you are not inclined to know the inner workings of the NPHC, we are not inclined to know the inner workings of the NPC or the NIC, THEREFORE the only thing we have to go by is what we see or read. SO, cash78mere, before you go off on someone & tell them to read the message boards, be sure YOU read them YOURSELF to make sure you have your facts straight.

Don't you EVER question the Brother & Sisterhood that members of the NPHC have INTER and INTRA-ORGANIZATIONALLY. If you're not IN IT, you WON'T UNDERSTAND.

peace out!
Well said Kelli!! Well said!

  #20  
Old 02-13-2001, 10:25 AM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Ideal08:
That being said, could you please tell me the amount of time that your GLO (not just xp2k, anyone can respond) spends in the African-American community? Since it doesn't "matter what GLO they joined as long as they had the same values and purposes to uplift the community."
Personally, we spend as much time in the African-American community as we do working in any other community - whether it be white, hispanic, homeless or the generally impoverished. Yeah, my fraternity does its share of partying and such, but we take philanthropic work extremely seriously - it's one of our ideals as a national, as well as our duty as human beings. I also know this is the hallmark of the traditionally BGLOs, which is impressive on the whole.

Also Ideal - good point about name-calling or whatever, it's never good to see a thread deteriorate into "you're this b/c you called me that" type discussions - and i'm out.
  #21  
Old 02-13-2001, 12:30 PM
mgdzkm433 mgdzkm433 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: eleanor, wv usa
Posts: 726
Post

Ok, this post is basically dividing BGLO's and GLO's more than they already are divided.

First of all, I think we are all smart enough to know that making assumptions on any organization based on seeing one chapter is not the way to go.

I don't doubt that there ARE organziations out there that 'drink and party' and that's it. I know that it happens, but it's NOT what any of our organizations were founded to do, or are present to do. It's sad that this happens, that the ideals get lost somewhere along the way. But it's not just GLO's that do this.

As far as letters go. I can wear my letters (DZ or SAI), but they are NOT SUPPOSED to be worn by anyone else OTHER than members. There's about a billion people in the US alone, you can't police everyone. People get ahold of lettered shirt, they wear them when they aren't supposed to--it happens, and I believe it happens to BGLO's too, don't you call these people posers? If I see someone wearing my letters that isn't supposed to be wearing them--I will say something, but I'm not going to beat them down for it. I wanted to bring up dropping, lavaliering, pinning, and shirting. These are all things that have to do with a romantic relationship. GLO's allow you to 'pin' or 'lavalier' your significant other or fiance if there is an 'obvious' intent to marry. Other than that--it's not allowed. Once a TKE friend of mine put his hat on my head as a joke to one of his brothers. He wanted his brother (whom he had not seen in a long time--he was actually an alumni) to think that he had 'settled down' (which is totally not his style). The guy actually thought we were getting married. It was a joke, for fun, there wasn't anything wrong with that--but I would never walk around sporting a TKE sweatshirt on my own. There's a difference. Just so you know, it's NOT common and it's NOT something that is supposed to be done.

Basically, to sum up, there's no reason to be attacking each other here. I was offended by the generalization of my own sorority along with all other GLO's by loviest95, it wasn't fair, and she doesn't have any other chapter to refrence. I'm not going to attack her for her statement though, and I don't think anyone else should either.

GLO's and BGLO's share a common goal--servicing the community. We might not be entirly the same, but maybe instead of fighting each other, we should work together? Why tear each other down, when we are supposed to be expending our energies into the community. I personally think it's sad.

  #22  
Old 02-13-2001, 02:22 PM
Ideal08 Ideal08 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In a whole 'nother world
Posts: 5,283
Post

Originally posted by mgdzkm433:
As far as letters go. I can wear my letters (DZ or SAI), but they are NOT SUPPOSED to be worn by anyone else OTHER than members. There's about a billion people in the US alone, you can't police everyone. People get ahold of lettered shirt, they wear them when they aren't supposed to--it happens, and I believe it happens to BGLO's too, don't you call these people posers? If I see someone wearing my letters that isn't supposed to be wearing them--I will say something, but I'm not going to beat them down for it.

***That is a generalization right there. Unless I mis-read your post, it sounds like you are saying members of BGLO's will "beat down" perps. That's one heck of a generalization. But I'm guessing that you are basing that on what you've read here on GC, just like my soror, lovliest95, based her generalization on the only chapters she has to reference. Both are generalizations.***

I wanted to bring up dropping, lavaliering, pinning, and shirting. These are all things that have to do with a romantic relationship. GLO's allow you to 'pin' or 'lavalier' your significant other or fiance if there is an 'obvious' intent to marry. Other than that--it's not allowed. Once a TKE friend of mine put his hat on my head as a joke to one of his brothers. He wanted his brother (whom he had not seen in a long time--he was actually an alumni) to think that he had 'settled down' (which is totally not his style). The guy actually thought we were getting married. It was a joke, for fun, there wasn't anything wrong with that--but I would never walk around sporting a TKE sweatshirt on my own. There's a difference. Just so you know, it's NOT common and it's NOT something that is supposed to be done.

***I don't care if I have a significant other, engaged, or married, I would not GIVE my letters to ANYONE!!! It is NOT fun, it is a SERIOUS MATTER. There's not a difference in my eyes. Wearing letters that are not your own, is wearing letters that are not your own, regardless of the reasoning behind it. LOL, I'm picturing a girl with a KAPsi, APhiA, IPhiT, PBS, or QPsiPhi pin on. LMAO!!! It ain't happenin'.***


[This message has been edited by Ideal08 (edited February 13, 2001).]
  #23  
Old 02-13-2001, 04:13 PM
equeen equeen is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 619
Send a message via AIM to equeen
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by 12dn94dst:
...As for this dropping thing, it still boils down to wearing letters that are not yours, regardless of if they're on a pin, hanging from a chain or on a shirt and regardless if they were "given" to you by some dude who thinks he loves you. If he loved you that much, he's buy an engagement ring or some other piece of jewlery to signify that love.
I would never, ever in my wildest dreams expect that a member of an NPHC fraternity would pin/lavalier his intended/serious girlfriend. At the same time, I cannot imagine that an IFC fraternity man who loves his brotherhood would not pin/lavalier his intended/serious girlfriend.

This is interesting to me - two diametrically opposing traditions, and they both embody the love of one's fraternity, as well as love for one's soulmate.

These differences in tradition, as divergent as they may be, both speak volumes of how much a man loves and respects his letters - but more importantly, how much his lady loves and respects him.

You know a lady loves her man when she wouldn't dream of touching anything with the letters he loves. You know a lady loves her man when she proudly bears the letters he loves. In either case, it conveys utmost love and respect.

------------------

@-->---
Pure as Silver, and True Blue!
Alpha Sigma Kappa - Women in Technical Studies




[This message has been edited by equeen (edited February 13, 2001).]
  #24  
Old 02-13-2001, 05:02 PM
Billy Optimist Billy Optimist is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 712
Post

I think it maybe comes from GLO's, to them letters are what one puts on a shirt, where as a lavarire, or pin, is a laveraire or pin, with the letters on it. Not HIS letters specificly. And I guess BGLO's see that anything with letters are the same. Different tradtions I geuss. LIke what equeen was talking about.

------------------
Once in every lifetime, you'll know what life is. Oh I need you, you need me, oh my darling, don't you see? The Young Ones. Darling we're The Young Ones. The Young Ones. Shouldn't be afraid! To live. To love. There's a song to be sung. 'Cause we may not be The Young Ones for very long!!!
  #25  
Old 02-13-2001, 05:04 PM
loviest95 loviest95 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 171
Post

It is so funny that my experience are being questioned..
I will say this and leave you to your own opinions

My organization has a history of acceptance
and the reason it was founded was because MOST (not all) WGLO's would not have taken my grandmother or my greatgrandmother

Can any of you deny that?

I still would love to know why anyone would want to be a part of something your grandparents were too dark for

Explain that to me

[This message has been edited by loviest95 (edited February 13, 2001).]
  #26  
Old 02-13-2001, 07:57 PM
cash78mere cash78mere is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NY
Posts: 1,198
Post

SO, cash78mere, before you go off on someone & tell them to read the message boards, be sure YOU read them YOURSELF to make sure you have your facts straight.

Don't you EVER question the Brother & Sisterhood that members of the NPHC have INTER and INTRA-ORGANIZATIONALLY. If you're not IN IT, you WON'T UNDERSTAND.
[/B][/QUOTE]


haha.....idle threats don't work with me dear. Saying "Don't you ever" just makes me laugh my head off. I will question whatever I WANT to question. I would never stop you from questioning me or my organization, but that doesn't mean I will agree with it. SO don't try to stop me.

I have read EVERY thread on every board. I know what goes on. My facts are as straight as can be. And I KNOW that some GLO MEMBERS, not the organizations themselves, will let another person wear their shirt. This is an individual choice, not something that is allowed by the organization. The ONLY time I ever let someone wear a letter shirt of mine was when the temperature dropped suddenly. My friend had a short sleeved shirt on and it began to rain. The temperature had dropped over 30 degrees and she was freezing and she had nothing she could put on. I happened to have a sweatshirt in my bag that I was giving to my little, so I gave it to my friend to wear. She was extremely greatful. So...my point.....yes, she was a member of another organization. But, my letters do not mean more to me that my friend's health. If I had not given her a shirt, I'm sure she would have gotten sick. The 'good deed' that I did exceeds ANY ridiculous pride that I might have about other people wearing letters. And if anyone quesioned me on my choice, I would question their morals. I would also question the value they put on their friendships.

Loviest questioned the workings of the GLO's. So I have every right to question her. I'm not making blanket statements about BGLO's and then exclaiming "That's why I love my AXO!"

I have no desire to understand the workings of the NPHC. I care about my own group, period. That doesn't mean I won't support the NPHC, but I sure don't agree with "beat downs" because someone is wearing my letters, or not letting a friend borrow my umbrella because it has my letters on it. The examples I stated above are examples that many (but maybe not all) BGLO members are proud of doing. And yes, I read that on these boards.

Lavaliers do not count as wearing letters. It is jewelry that is given as a symbol of love. It is not a person 'giving' their letters away.

To the person asking how we can be members of an organization that would not have accepted them 100 years ago. Well, what can I do about that? Times change, and so do people. If that was true today, no, I could not be a member. But GLO's accept members of ANY race. We do not discriminate. (There may be exceptions to this rule with individual chapters, but they will obviously be shut down if they are discovered. We have seen that happen. No one agrees with their policies)

To the person who asked about supporting black neighborhoods with our community service. Let me ask you----are you supporting poor white communities? I doubt it. Are they not as deserving? They are people after all. GLO's do not chose the color of the people that they help. We help anyone and everyone. When I volunteer at a women's shelter, I don't care if I am helping a black woman or a white woman......I am helpng a WOMAN. Period.

I am secure in myself and my GLO. We are positive, supportive groups who will help anyone in need. And I am extremely proud of that.
  #27  
Old 02-14-2001, 01:21 AM
12dn94dst 12dn94dst is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,431
Post

Not all people "illegally" wearing our letters are perps. Some honestly don't know better. They are handled one way. The ones who actually claim to be members of the organization are the perps, and you don't have to be wearing letters to perp. They are dealt with in another. As for this dropping thing, it still boils down to wearing letters that are not yours, regardless of if they're on a pin, hanging from a chain or on a shirt and regardless if they were "given" to you by some dude who thinks he loves you. If he loved you that much, he's buy an engagement ring or some other piece of jewlery to signify that love. The only reason anyone should be wearing letters is if they were duly initiated into the organization that uses them.

As far as this post causing further division, I disagree. The ORIGINAL message is a valid one for the minority community. True, it could have been handled a little differently, but the message is there and I'm sure it's been received loud and clear.


[This message has been edited by 12dn94dst (edited February 13, 2001).]
  #28  
Old 02-14-2001, 10:59 AM
AXO Alum AXO Alum is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: southeast of disorder
Posts: 3,222
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by cash78mere:
But, my letters do not mean more to me that my friend's health.

To the person who asked about supporting black neighborhoods with our community service. Let me ask you----are you supporting poor white communities? I doubt it. Are they not as deserving? They are people after all. GLO's do not chose the color of the people that they help. We help anyone and everyone. When I volunteer at a women's shelter, I don't care if I am helping a black woman or a white woman......I am helpng a WOMAN. Period.

I am secure in myself and my GLO. We are positive, supportive groups who will help anyone in need. And I am extremely proud of that.
I agree with this 110% -- we help anyone in need -- and no it has never mattered to me what color skin the women and children at shelters have -- usually their skin is black and blue from being beaten. And what are we on here doing? BEATING each other because we are comparing APPLES AND ORANGES!

Apples = BGLO standards of never letting another person wear their letters....Oranges = WGLO standards of frat brothers showing their love for a woman by pinning or lavelering her. APPLES AND ORANGES, PEOPLE! And contrary to the quite popular belief on here - NEITHER IS BETTER THAN THE OTHER. Its about da%& time that we ALL came to realize that.

We are here to learn from each other -- and as the dead horse lying there stinking with flies around it has already shown, we will never be able to discuss race issues on here with any type of positive outcome. All we do is continually draw those same lines over and over and DARE each other to cross them with our words.

We will never understand the workings of each other's orgs because we will never be in them -- so why say "don't EVER say" anything when none of us can "EVER" say and be 100% correct on any org other than our own?!

And I will just go ahead and throw this in since it seems to be 100% perfectly acceptable to label one group but not another -- calling someone a "Redneck" is just as derrogatory as calling someone else an innappropriate slur. Here is a little quote from the book "The Ballad of Frankie Silver" by Sharyn McCrumb: "Political correctness [does] not require tolerance or courtesy to white Southerners." I think that quote speaks volumes about how people speak negatively of one group everyday out in public with no thought as to what they are saying, yet have a freaking cow if someone were to use such a slur towards another group.

Racism is not a one-way street --- it is never right to hate/treat differently/show a lack of respect/call names/etc. regardless of what color skin a person has. NEVER NEVER NEVER - because if you say its not okay for one person to do it to you, then it sure the hell shouldn't be okay for you to do it to another person. Don't make excuses for yourself -- be yourself -- let other people see you for what you are and for who you are -- we are only responsible for how we personally act towards others. We sure aren't here to do the judging!!!
  #29  
Old 02-14-2001, 11:02 AM
loviest95 loviest95 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 171
Post

cash78mere,

I did not make a blanket statement.. I posted MY personal experinces

I do not take offense to what you say because
in the long run
We come from 2 different places

I want you to understand that being proud of my organization does not mean that I do not expect that you would not be proud of yours

Make no mistake I work hard for the community at large but I work very hard for MY Community

It's just like neighborhood clean up
you must start with your own

Ivy in my Hand-- AKA in my HEART!!
Skee-wee!!!!!!!!
  #30  
Old 02-14-2001, 11:06 AM
loviest95 loviest95 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 171
Post

The comment is well taken
However they considered themselves rednecks

The signs on the dorm room doors stated

Pro
WHITE
MALE
hetero

REDNECK and Proud

Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.