Colonization at the University of Alabama?!? - Page 10

KSUViolet06 · #1 02-12-2008, 05:54 PM

I hear you guys about rumors. There's a chapter on my campus that has been "getting kicked off for selling pot out of their house" since I was a freshman in 2002.

GeekyPenguin · #2 02-12-2008, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSUViolet06

I hear you guys about rumors. There's a chapter on my campus that has been "getting kicked off for selling pot out of their house" since I was a freshman in 2002.

Well I heard the only reason they weren't kicked off yet is because they are selling to XYZ and have turned state's evidence against those hazing stuck up snobs!

lauralaylin · #3 02-13-2008, 08:42 PM

That list is quite inaccurate, missing many chapters as well.

PiPhiAngel07 · #4 02-13-2008, 10:26 PM

Not that it is set in stone as of now, but chapters at Bama had to vote tonight on a suggestion to accept the colonization of Alpha Phi in 2008 and DG in 2010. I do not know what other houses voted but our house voted to accept it. All of the houses will have one vote on the matter and I do not see why any house would reject the expansion of the grrek system at UA.

#5 02-13-2008, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiPhiAngel07

Not that it is set in stone as of now, but chapters at Bama had to vote tonight on a suggestion to accept the colonization of Alpha Phi in 2008 and DG in 2010. I do not know what other houses voted but our house voted to accept it. All of the houses will have one vote on the matter and I do not see why any house would reject the expansion of the grrek system at UA.

Is it really necessary to post such things when they're not "set in stone" yet?

Zillini · #6 02-13-2008, 11:19 PM

The decision to expand has already been made. Now it is simply a matter of which of the 3 GLOs that presented will be invited and which year. Chapters first vote amongst themselves. I believe the Panhellenic meeting is this coming Monday where the delegates will then cast their Chapters' vote. We should know the official results shortly thereafter.

Bama_Alumna · #7 02-14-2008, 10:25 AM

*poof*

deleted

AnchorAlumna · #8 02-14-2008, 12:01 PM

Thank you!

KSUViolet06 · #9 02-14-2008, 04:54 PM

Ok I'm pretty sure that the above was not meant to be released to the public, since the final vote hasn't take place yet. Not a good idea to post that.

BamaGal1203 · #10 02-14-2008, 05:03 PM

Well why bother to vote at all? Why ask nationals to present in good faith if it is already a done deal? Seems to me that Bama Alumna must have made said decision all by herself. Wow, what a powerful diva she is!

#11 02-14-2008, 05:10 PM

Would it be possible to lock this darned thread until official word comes from Alabama Panhellenic?

GammaPhiBabe · #12 02-14-2008, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BamaGal1203

Well why bother to vote at all? Why ask nationals to present in good faith if it is already a done deal?

All three presentations have already been made, though. I think the memo BamaAlum posted is just saying that the extension committee has looked at the scores from those presentations and is making a recommendation to Panhellenic. Still, it doesn't sound like public information!

BamaGal1203 · #13 02-14-2008, 05:15 PM

AMEN TO THAT!

BamaGal1203 · #14 02-14-2008, 06:33 PM

If this is true, the whole thing has been handled in a very unprofessional manner and will appear to me to be a "done deal." The nationals presenting who put time and effort into this should be informed of any outcome before some loose cannon shoots off her mouth on a chat board. Frankly, I am very disappointed in the process.

UGAalum94 · #15 02-14-2008, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BamaGal1203

If this is true, the whole thing has been handled in a very unprofessional manner and will appear to me to be a "done deal." The nationals presenting who put time and effort into this should be informed of any outcome before some loose cannon shoots off her mouth on a chat board. Frankly, I am very disappointed in the process.

It may be the case that the recommendation of the committee has always been voted on and affirmed in the past. A lot of things work that way it seems to me. It doesn't mean it was a bogus process, just that the final vote isn't actually likely to change the outcome. It might even be the case that all the full vote could do would be send the extension committee back to the drawing board, rather than change the groups selected.

Alabama wins no matter which groups are selected.

If the info IS accurate, yea Syracuse Triad at Bama! (I bet it was the wikipedia entry that tipped the scales

) and yea DG is 2010!