|
Well I got the heads up about the thread after that and I responded about the reason about the first (INITIAL) article in the Hilltop.
But I will indulge you on the second letter. That letter was written after the response to the first letter from someone within APO. Plain and simple. Once again APO took the first letter as an offense when your org was NEVER MENTIONED IN IT. The second letter was the brother's defense for a chapter member. Do I condone it? NO I don't because I don't believe in writing back and forth over a dead issue. A issue which is dead becasue APO was never mentioned in the first article. I would've laugh it off and kept it moving. But that's just me personally.
So can we all be in agreement that APO wasn't being dissed (having it's legitimacy challenged) in the first article (maybe the second one but I didn't see it) adn say that this thing got started over nothing?
|
Threaded Mode