Quote:
Originally posted by Ideal08
Am I to understand that this article does not boost your viewpoint? 
The article is full of OPINIONS on whether or not the memos are authentic. Or are there some facts to prove that he did not ignore a direct order from a superior officer and lose his status as a Guard pilot because he failed to meet military performance standards and undergo a required physical exam? Because I think I missed the facts in this one. Words like 'doubt' and phrases like 'virtually certain' do not constitute fact, or do they? 
|
No, what you are to understand is that its not only about looking at 1 side of an issue which is what many people do. Its not my viewpoint I didnt serve in the National Guard or Vietnam...but the point is there are always 2 sides to an issue..and its ignorant to only seek out things that line up with what you believe in. I'm not singling you out..just speaking generally...
If you read the article you'd see that its likely that the documents written in 1972 were written using Microsoft programs..because typewriters back then could not type in superscript. Its likely a forgery.
Threaded Mode