Why not just have a scholarship then to pay the dues for people that opt to join less popular groups? Or some other kind of financial consideration?
Why be so focused on crippling a system to save one group? For example, lets say you keep total and quota the same in the spirirt of saving a chapter with 25 percent of the members of the rest of the groups, when you could probably bring in two more groups and Rush them to total?
Quote:
[i]
Now how is that fair? Why couldn't the campus put the energy and passion into helping the fourth group succeed? Closing a group and bringing on a new one just b/c they have a "more attractive product" will do nothing to help the Greek system. That new package will only be attractive for so long, and then a new group will be on the bottom and struggling. Fix the problems, not the symptoms.
And how can you say "invite good nationals to come in" - aren't they all good? [/B]
|
Threaded Mode