Even though many musicians, like metalica and britney spears, tend to get wealthy from record sales, I don't agree with their music being free--I don't care where you get it. Those people worked hard to get where they are, and whether or not they are millionaires doesn't mean a thing. So, to make a long story short, I think it's right that people pay for the music if they get it from napster. I could, however, see it to be fine if the musicians agree that napster can release their music for free--written permission of course. If an artist wants this service to continue, hey, let them give out their music, but for those who want the public to pay for it, then it should be payed for.
|
Hybrid Mode
