|
Really? It's only fair that Kerry be held to the same standard they're holding the Bush campaign to.
Bush had all of his records released -- he was actually VERY cooperative with the media in this area. Even held a press conference in which they discussed the information on record.
Why not Kerry?
If he's going to sell himself as a war hero (which he certainly would not have even thought about doing in his immediate post-war years) why should the American people not have the right to know whether or not he's being truthful about his record? Kerry has always been a man of two truths, why should anyone think this instance would be any different?
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|
Threaded Mode