I beleive the NPHC is a governing body by agreement not ooboligation. WHile they set guidelines they all orgs can voluntarily choose to comply with, enforcement of those mandates is up to the individual org. Also, to call auxiliaries illegal is a misnomer, thir mere existance is not breaking any law. Hazing a pledge of an aux. s another story.
I wonder how long they would last if someone instigated a law uit against the lage org that is looking the other way? Even an unsuccesful suit would bring attention to there persistance...
As far as some of the sites on the net, certain groups have supposedly incorporated themselves in an attempt to legitimize their existance although they are still heavily associated in practice with the NPHC org in most circumstances, whether their site or charter acknowledges that.
|
Hybrid Mode
