GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Delta > Delta Sigma Theta

» GC Stats
Members: 332,802
Threads: 115,742
Posts: 2,208,451
Welcome to our newest member, ajuliaitt9468
» Online Users: 4,973
2 members and 4,971 guests
gatordeltapgh, PGD-GRAD
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 11-28-2003, 05:39 PM
Honeykiss1974 Honeykiss1974 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta y'all!
Posts: 5,894
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: actually...

Quote:
Originally posted by librasoul22
I think when someone says "he who is without sin..." they really mean that one sin is not greater than the other in the eyes of the Lord. So therefore if you are engaging in premarital sex, who are you to condemn homosexuality? It is not criticizing your BELIEF, rather the hypocrisy it includes. (Honeykiss, not directed to you personally, I mean "you" in the general sense.)
Oh, I know Librasoul22. Ita all about discussion and not attacks.

When Jesus used that statement (when the men were stoning the whore), it was because those men were committing sin iin their own personal lives and were unrepent. (some even with her). It was not because no one should ever be vocal enough to say when something is not right or is wrong.

Therefore "He who is without sin..." is not a blanket statement that should be used to overlook wrong behaviors in others, but a call for us to "discerning" rather than negative or critical.

In a real life example, let's say you were married and I find out you are having an affair with someone and I call you on it. It is not wrong nor am I judging you if my motives are out of concern for you (and to see you do the right thing by your marriage).

However, it is wrong if I call you on it simply for selfish reasons such as jealousy (or because I want to see your marriage ruined, or to gossip or spread rumours about you,etc.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ok, back to gay marriages. I still say there should be no federal classification of "married" as it relates to those that are "single". Marriage is a religious institution with a religious foundation. Marriage was not created so that two people could be put on an insurance policy.

By eliminating any federal acknowledgment or distinction, then this discussion will be over. Private companies or hospitals can longer make "spousal requirements". There will abe no need to file for a marriage liscense or go to divorce court. No seperate taxes rates or marriage penalty.

So what's wrong with this solution? I know t may not be as fun to argue over, but still.
__________________
"I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is to try to please everyone."
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.