Quote:
Originally posted by Educated
I recommend the definition of hazing be redefined to demand the VICTIM of the hazing acknowledge they were hazed. Just like a battery.. if the victim says I wasn't battered, THERE IS NO CRIME.
With current hazing guidelines, the vicitm could say, I WASN'T HAZED and Universities can still charge you with hazing. So stupid.
***And don't mention the kids that get killed not being able to say it was hazing. 
|
Even if the laws were changed, it's irrelevant. A university's code of conduct and the laws are two different issues. Just look at typical university "no keg" policy or a policy that prohibits alcohol in greek houses. It's not against the law for someone over the age of 21 to purchase, consume or serve alcohol to guests who are also of legal age, but universities can still prohibit member organizations from doing so.
Threaded Mode