Quote:
Originally posted by sugar and spice
I agree. I couldn't believe some of the stuff that was being said in this thread. If I'm not going to wear a shirt anymore, I'd rather have it go to someone who needs it than to rip it up and have them go shirtless. Nobody's going to think that the homeless lady down on the street is actually a Tri Delta. It's not reflecting badly on my organization. In fact, if you actually took the time to think about it, it's reflecting well on my organization because I donated clothes to the homeless rather than only thinking of myself.
I do agree with GeekyPenguin, though, that there's a difference between a homeless woman and the random girl in my English discussion section.
|
Exactly. I think it reflects well on a GLO if they donate their shirts to someone who truly needs clothes.
I do agree that people that are just trying to look cool should have no right to wear letters.
But...come on, people!
In addition, I don't think it's too kind to absolutely humiliate someone for wearing the letters. It's a good idea to point out to them (NICELY!!!) that what they're doing isn't cool...but humiliating someone? No.
Threaded Mode
