BCS rankings just don't make sense

[amycat412]

Iowa, I agree with you, and I'd love to see a USC-Iowa Rose Bowl pitting Heisman candidates Palmer and Banks against one another. Now that would be a great game.

But the whole FSU with what, 5 losses, getting an automatic BCS bowl is RIDICULOUS.

Ohio State not getting penalized for the games IowaHawkeye mentioned, but USC getting penalized for the 3 pt OT loss to WSU and 7 pt loss to Kansas State? Or, WSU dropping from 3 to 8 because of a 3 pt loss in TRIPLE OT to UW?

And Margin of Victory-- YES YES YES. Would help my cause, as USC's only barely squeaked by victory was to Cal at 30-28.

We beat Auburn 24-17
Colorado State 40-3
Oregon State 22-0
Washington 44-21
Oregon 44-33
Stanford 49-17
ASU 34-13
UCLA 52-21

All very SOLID wins.

and lost to
WA State 30-27 in OT
Kansas State 27-20

Does not seem the rules are applied fairly across the board.

IMO, the top 8 teams should get the BCS slots, PERIOD. Screw FSU's auto bid and Wash St getting rose Bowl because of head-to-head tie breaker thing. Of course, WA State has to get past UCLA on the 7th, and possibly w/o Jason Gesser. And after USC humiliatiion of UCLA, I think UCLA may just be able to pull out the win, and then USC would get the Rose Bowl that we deserve.