|
I think it is pretty crazy to think that a national chapter who was well aware of their own regualtions(as in it is printed in B&W) would have to be forced to do this. If they broke the rule they should be strong enough to deal with the punishment and rebuild.
Is it me or maybe someone else sees this: If we do not like the regualtion, we wait until it is inforced to rage against it and say how it should change for our situation? As in the NPC resolution...
At my school we cannot have open parties at houses, apts and so on. Not b/c the school says so b/c our national regualtion says so. And when we are there(3rd party vendor), we check IDs and have a birthday list at the door for members and guests. I know some schools do not have 3rd party vendors....that situation I am not sure about.
When I was in school this whole thing started and was difficult to start relearning how to throw a party, but I think if we joined a group and signed risk management papers/membership responsibilities you are expected to follow through on your pledge of membership. Why are we OK with collecting benifits from a group if we are not being a productive member?
The idea is to have a SAFE, GOOD TIME!
|
Threaded Mode