Quote:
Originally Posted by honeychile
I have a very real problem with BK not having to tell the families WHY he decided to kill four people. That is the very least that he owes them.
|
Yep, but I think in a lot of cases like this one, especially thrill killings or psychopathic crimes, there’s like really no clear, rational “why” that brings real closure. Bryan Kohberger’s case shows classic signs of an offender who wanted to feel power, control, or like satisfy some dark fantasy. But when you try to translate that into normal human logic, “Why these kids? Why that night?” It doesn’t add up in a way that gives families peace.
I mean, courts can prove how and who, but “why” is often twisted, vague, or just plain empty. He might say something if he wanted to manipulate sympathy, but the real answer is likely worse and that there is no answer that makes sense, because the void in him doesn’t make sense.
__________________
Phi Sigma
Biological Sciences Honor Society
“Daisies that bring you joy are better than roses that bring you sorrow. If I had my life to live over, I'd pick more Daisies!”