Quote:
Originally posted by UF_PikePC98
What ever happened to being innocent until proven guilty?
Although the circumstances do point to the boy being the rapist, isn't kinda early to be naming someone until the DNA test are back? There have been countless instances where evidence points to a person but lab tests prove their innocence. Since some of you probably would not reckonize court cases of the exact situation let me give you an example many of you might understand......
Example: The Green Mile with Tom Hanks----Everyone thought the black guy raped and murdered the little white girls but it was actually the crazy guy who was helping on the farm....
UF-
*Ahhh--- it would be fun being a defense attorney*
|
Sooooo... You're defending a baby rapist. Okaaaayyy!
Example: Recent episode of South Park. "So what do you see as the advantages of toddler murder?" Tweak "Well, it's easy." Newscaster "Yes, it is easy."
Note: I was going to start on lawyer jokes but but we have some very admirable lawyers here that I didn't want to insult.
Threaded Mode