GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 332,039
Threads: 115,729
Posts: 2,208,095
Welcome to our newest member, zajamesmaarlyz3
» Online Users: 2,641
1 members and 2,640 guests
Cookiez17
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #34  
Old 07-11-2013, 02:19 AM
AOII Angel AOII Angel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by AXOmom View Post
There are several good issues in your post that could keep this thread going until we are all too old to type and living on social security- LOL. I’m not going to go any farther off topic and than I already have and delve into those. Instead, I’ll stick to the one I’ve been posting about.

People can vote for or against things for any reason they choose. There is no stopping that since we cannot know why a person is voting a certain way unless they choose to tell us, and we can’t stop them from telling us why they will vote a certain way or why they think others should without violating their freedom of speech. Whether or not it might be more politically expedient to give non-religious reasons for voting a certain way is another issue all together.

There is nothing I know of in the Constitution or the law that prevents a person from voting, speaking out, joining groups, and /or peacefully protesting on the basis of their religious beliefs in the same way any one else votes on the basis of their non-religious beliefs. There is no way that I know of not to vote on the basis of your beliefs, religious or not, since we all have them, so if voting on the basis of religious beliefs is the equivalent of “forcing” your beliefs on someone, voting on the basis of any belief is the equivalent of “forcing” your beliefs on someone and if that’s the case, the only solution I see is to forego laws.

You used that example of recent gay marriage laws as an example, I think, of passing legislation, on the basis of your beliefs that do not affect anyone who may disagree with the law. If every piece of legislation passed would only affect those who voted for it and agree with it that example would work, but that’s the exception and not the rule. In other words, we’ve all had a part in passing legislation we believed in and we knew would affect others who might disagree with it, but we voted for it anyway because we personally thought it was right. Does this mean we forced our views on others? I don’t think so.

Here’s an example. I live in a state where many consider themselves environmentalists and that belief system governs much of the way they vote and most of the people they vote for because they feel strongly about the environment. Recently in Portland a regulation passed that said everyone in the county had to compost or they would be fined. Some people resent the heck out of this and feel they are being “forced” to go along with someone else’s environmental beliefs. I don’t particularly want to compost either (looks disgusting, hate the smell), but I disagree that they are being forced. The environmentalists in our state have done a fantastic job of speaking their mind, protesting, getting their message out to the media, forming action groups, hiring lobbyists, voting, and voting for people who agreed with them. Those who oppose had every opportunity to do the same, but they chose not to – bad on them, but they haven’t had a viewpoint forced on them. The county voted on a law that reflected a group’s viewpoint about something they believe was a good, moral thing to do, and it passed. Welcome to America. This is what we do and the process is the same for everyone – religious or not.





*****






My opinion is: Religion can play a role in what you (the general you) believe to be right, but it shouldn't define everything you do, everything you say, and every interaction you have with other human beings. It can guide you morally and it can give you faith and hope, but it shouldn't make you believe that everyone should be just like you, think exactly like you do, and want all of the same things that you do.

It's totally possible that I'm entirely missing your point here (it's late) and please feel free to correct me, but the bolded comes across like this, "Don't tell me to think like you, but in my opinion, here's how you should think and feel about the role of religion in your life, so in other words, you should think about it the way I think you should think about it."


And yeah, we should probably all step away because we all must have lives out there somewhere that we need to get back to.
Yeah...no. I'm about as liberal as they come, but I wouldn't be composting, and I wouldn't pay a fine either. That's the most intrusive, ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Just because a vocal group gets something passed doesn't make it right or constitutional. I think you are missing the point behind the argument.
__________________

AOII

One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!





Last edited by AOII Angel; 07-11-2013 at 02:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New IFC restrictions for "State" Patty's Day. psusue Greek Life 10 02-12-2010 12:35 AM
Calif. Edu. state budget cuts-weigh in cutiepatootie News & Politics 1 03-09-2008 02:00 AM
Ohio State KDS trojangal Kappa Delta 0 07-17-2005 03:34 PM
Ohio State Day dixiesong3131 Phi Mu 5 04-03-2003 01:22 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.