Quote:
Originally posted by SigmaChiCard
stupid, but...
True...other people have been rude as all hell, but are generally good posters. For example....generally I think that UNF is a good poster....I don't necesarily think he's being exactly compassionate on the homosexual board currently going on, but as he is a generally good poster...he has some slack. The TKE guy maybe should be contacted and asked to clean up his act or prepare for banishment. The point being....UF was only controversial and offensive...he contributed nothing but the personal satisfaction of offending others. There lies the difference.
|
Ahh...so there are degrees? So if someone makes an insanely offensive post but then has a post that SOMONE on GC deems insightful, then it balances out? Sorry, this doesn't make much sense. It doesn't matter what a person has contributed in the past, if they begin to post offensive comments at any time, the treatment should be the same. Just because you (general you, no YOU specifically) do not agree with what someone says doesn't mean it doesn't have merit. I challenge anyone to search UF_Pike's posts and tell me that ALL of them were offensive.
I might just be very liberal, but I simply do not agree that anyone on GC should be "banished" due to the sensitivity of some of the members.
And hey, lol, if PM_Mama, who had the MOST trouble with him, is questioning the banishment, that means something!
Hybrid Mode
