Quote:
Originally Posted by jazing
I don't know about forced DD, but if people are under 21, they aren't allowed to drink anyways. I don't think anyone would hold it against you if you say someone under 21 cannot drink and has to be your DD. If they are over 21, then it can be hazing.
|
The issue with the DDs isn't that under 21s shouldn't be drinking. What if the completely sober DD's contact lens pops out, he can't see and drives the car into a tree? If the fraternity had a written-down DD program, that can be seen as the fraternity assuming responsibility.
And yes I agree this sucks and it's far better to have DDs, but this is the legalese.
Threaded Mode
