GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 331,951
Threads: 115,725
Posts: 2,208,029
Welcome to our newest member, goodmen24
» Online Users: 2,685
1 members and 2,684 guests
Cookiez17
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:17 PM
AOII Angel AOII Angel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by AXOmom View Post
^^^Ha! Beat you to it! .

MysticCat - The print version of this article was either more thorough, or I couldn't get the entire online version to come up - not sure which, but in the print version, the parents did say, they would have terminated the pregnancy if they had known. I have ethical issues with that since I am, like ThetaPrincess24, pro-life, but since she is alive and well, and the lab apparently did make a mistake, I do understand that regardless of my personal feelings on it, it is legal and in this case because of a lab screw up they didn't have the information they needed to make a decision and now her medical costs need to be covered - so I'm a little torn on how this should have been resolved.

I have a legal question for you - In medical malpractice does the law normally differentiate between understandable mistakes - i.e. the idea that no doctor, nurse or lab is going to be 100% correct, sloppy mistakes that should not be made, and reprehensible mistakes where it was obvious something bad would happen (i.e. doctor operating while intoxicated)- a negligent homicide situation. In this case it seems like this lawsuit was the first situation - the lab isn't going to be 100% correct all the time. In that case, it's hard for me to see how they won this suit other than the jury felt sorry for their situation (which I would as well, but we aren't supposed to make legal decisions that way). Am I missing something?

I don't think this case takes away from your point - that these suits aren't usually attempted or won - at all. I can see that. I don't think they would have won this suit in most places, but we aren't most places. I am reminded of that daily. We still don't think people can pump their own gas- so just because they won in Oregon - means nothing in 49 other states.
Um...that's clearly malpractice. If you have a chromosomal test for Down Syndrome that is negative, and you have a child with Down Syndrome, some one made a major mistake. That's not a little whoops. That's a gotta get it right 100% of the time kinda test.
__________________

AOII

One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!




Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arizona governor signs immigration bill DaemonSeid News & Politics 272 06-21-2010 10:38 AM
House passes health care bill on 219-212 vote DaemonSeid Chit Chat 288 03-30-2010 01:15 PM
Anti-hazing Bill in Arizona Legislature exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 0 01-29-2009 05:51 PM
Very Interesting, Arizona Bill Tom Earp Greek Life 5 01-30-2005 11:43 AM
Cali senate passes bill to lower voting age to 14 The1calledTKE News & Politics 17 05-10-2004 12:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.