1911 United: Re-elect President Obama

[Ghostwriter]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

That's not always the case and we know it.

We all know there are exceptions to every case. There are always outliers in every demographic.

Wonder what the Kappas and Omegas would have done if Cain had won the Republican nomination? Food for thought.

[knight_shadow]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

I think Ghostwriter was speaking for himself.

I was commenting on...

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

Many of us didn't vote for Obama because of his policies and left leaning ideology. Color of skin had nothing to do with it.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

I was commenting on...

I totally missed the "many of us." LOL. My bad.

"Many of us" are..."many of us" are not...this is one of those topics where every side of the issue has "many of us."

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

We all know there are exceptions to every case. There are always outliers in every demographic.

You consider that exceptions and outliers. I do not.

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

Wonder what the Kappas and Omegas would have done if Cain had won the Republican nomination? Food for thought.

Why is that food for thought? Think about why YOU think that is food for thought. There is something embedded in the mere suggestion that this would be food for thought.

What is embedded in that suggestion makes your "exceptions" and "outliers" no longer so, including for yourself.

[Ghostwriter]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

You consider that exceptions and outliers. I do not.

Why is that food for thought? Think about why YOU think that is food for thought. There is something embedded in the mere suggestion that this would be food for thought.

What is embedded in that suggestion makes your "exceptions" and "outliers" no longer so, including for yourself.

So?

Go back to your kitty litter box. Not going to play with you.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

So?

Go back to your kitty litter box. Not going to play with you.

Shut up, bitch.

[alphatausc]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Shut up, bitch.

Doctor, doctor, doctor. *Shakes head*.

[Ghostwriter]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Shut up, bitch.

Not going to you Oswald Bates wanna be.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

....Oswald Bates wanna be.

Interesting.

[Senusret I]

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

Wonder what the Kappas and Omegas would have done if Cain had won the Republican nomination? Food for thought.

Nobody has won the Republican nomination yet, first of all. Secondly, they would have done the same thing because they are Obama supporters.

Your food for thought does not nourish me.

[knight_shadow]

Originally Posted by Senusret I

Your food for thought does not nourish me.

[Cen1aur 1963]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

Psi U MC Vito didn't respond to you at all. You initiated the conversation with him...

I feel you and I was wrong. I already admitted to that, with an apology.

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

All the pot/kettle irony here, and me without my cyberfood. *Sigh*

Girl please, the same thing applies to you, with some of the disrespectful shit you've posted to me.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

Some of us see the irony in Ghostwriter's food for thought.

For those who do not see the irony, it is humorous to claim that race and ethnicity are not a factor for "many of us," and that it is only the exception, but then to offer food for thought that implies the exact opposite.

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by Senusret I

Your food for thought does not nourish me.

Definitely quotable.

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Some of us see the irony in Ghostwriter's food for thought.

For those who do not see the irony, it is humorous to claim that race and ethnicity are not a factor for "many of us," and that it is only the exception, but then to offer food for thought that implies the exact opposite.

Well, it doesn't imply the exact opposite -- methinks the food for thought was about "many of them," not "many of us."

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

Well, it doesn't imply the exact opposite -- methinks the food for thought was about "many of them," not "many of us."

That food for thought was about Ghostwriter's own assumptions. His own assumptions makes it about him and not about them.