GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 332,801
Threads: 115,742
Posts: 2,208,451
Welcome to our newest member, znatlietopz5629
» Online Users: 4,482
1 members and 4,481 guests
Cookiez17
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2011, 11:54 AM
Munchkin03 Munchkin03 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Who would those parties be? All I can think of are insurance companies...

As a divorce lawyer, I welcome expanding my client base by 10%.
I'm trying to figure out who these parties would be!

Have you had to deal with any gay "divorces"? I put "divorce" in quotes because I know gay marriage is not legal, or recognized, in OK--but informal unions, especially when kids are involved, dissolve all the time.

I'm not even sure if insurance companies would suffer, since most gay households are dual-income and, it stands to reason, are insured individually. We didn't hear anything from the insurance lobby in NYS so they might not even be impacted negatively.

Last edited by Munchkin03; 06-27-2011 at 11:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2011, 01:41 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03 View Post
Have you had to deal with any gay "divorces"? I put "divorce" in quotes because I know gay marriage is not legal, or recognized, in OK--but informal unions, especially when kids are involved, dissolve all the time.
Yes, in a limited capacity. I was hired to help dissolve (by agreement) a lesbian household in Stillwater, OK. It basically never went anywhere though. In Oklahoma, were I hired on to one of these as a contested action, I'd treat it as a partnership and apply the same law to dissolving the "marriage" as I would to the dissolution of a for-profit partnership. On paper at least, it seems to be a viable theory.

Quote:
I'm not even sure if insurance companies would suffer, since most gay households are dual-income and, it stands to reason, are insured individually. We didn't hear anything from the insurance lobby in NYS so they might not even be impacted negatively.
That's the only non-religious reason I could cook up. Like you, I'm without much of an answer as to who is harmed here. But the religious folks seem willing to spend massive amounts of money on this fight.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Memphis Chartering Approved! LXAMEMPHIS Lambda Chi Alpha 3 07-21-2005 04:11 PM
New York moving along the marriage path IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 9 02-05-2005 12:07 PM
Abraham Lincoln was a gay republican who approved of same-sex marriage IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 13 12-22-2004 07:47 PM
Same-sex marriage ban fails in Senate Lil' Hannah News & Politics 39 07-16-2004 08:53 AM
Brown approved by Senate panel D.COM Delta Sigma Theta 0 11-07-2003 09:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.