GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Recruitment > Sorority Recruitment

Sorority Recruitment Recruitment event and bid day ideas, membership retention, publicity, recruitment policies, etc.

» GC Stats
Members: 333,229
Threads: 115,747
Posts: 2,208,595
Welcome to our newest member, avictoiayandext
» Online Users: 2,598
1 members and 2,597 guests
Raysoflight
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-2011, 01:38 PM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby View Post
The problem, as I see it, is that there seem to be huge numbers of QA's at the same time there are chapters not making quota. I am really torn on this, because I don't want women to go bidless, but on the other hand, it really hurts the smaller chapters.

I also don't know if there have been changes to the RFM over the years. As I understood it, back when I was in school the formula was:

invitations = (number of women still in recruitment/number of chapters) *(number of parties in the round/average return rate of the last three years)

So, if there were 500 women going to pref, and each woman could attend two prefs, and ten chapters, a chapter with a 100% return rate could issue 150 pref invitations, and a chapter with a 50% return rate could issue 300 invitations.
Perhaps the best thing would have been to work all the bugs out of RFM and get rushees/chapters used to it, and THEN up the quota additions. (The result being, theoretically, that quota additions wouldn't be needed.)
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-11-2011, 06:20 PM
DeltaBetaBaby DeltaBetaBaby is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ILL-INI
Posts: 7,220
Send a message via AIM to DeltaBetaBaby
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl View Post
Perhaps the best thing would have been to work all the bugs out of RFM and get rushees/chapters used to it, and THEN up the quota additions. (The result being, theoretically, that quota additions wouldn't be needed.)
That's what I'm saying. I understand why we want to place as many women as possible, but I'm not certain that QA is the way to do it.

Obviously I am a small-chapter advocate, and we've talked before on here about the way to make 18-year-old women consider the smaller chapters or chapters that may not be viewed as "top-tier". But with QA's as they are, aren't we effectively telling them that there is less reason to consider the smaller chapters? If a bid were less of a sure thing, would women be more honest with themselves about where they belong?

On the sororities' side, we very often have to gauge a PNM's interest, and release women who we'd love to have in favor of women we think are more likely to join. For example, the triple XYZ legacy whose sister is the current president may not get invited back while a grade risk who we know wants to be in our chapter would. Shouldn't we put PNM's through the same type of thinking process?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NPC Quota, Release Figures and Quota Additions (Updated 8/7/2007) PenguinTrax Recruitment Stories 168 09-05-2010 05:48 PM
quota additions FSUZeta Sorority Recruitment 27 09-04-2007 06:30 PM
NPC Quota, Release Figures and Quota Additions PenguinTrax Recruitment 66 05-31-2004 06:00 PM
Livrary Additions DeltaSigStan Tau Beta Sigma 7 01-15-2004 11:23 AM
Quota The1calledTKE Tau Kappa Epsilon 0 12-19-2001 05:29 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.