GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 332,023
Threads: 115,729
Posts: 2,208,086
Welcome to our newest member, zraheltts1871
» Online Users: 2,276
2 members and 2,274 guests
Xidelt
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2010, 02:47 AM
amanda6035 amanda6035 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Smiths Station, AL
Posts: 1,754
^^ I agree. I just hope the military actually punishes those people who deserve to be punished.
__________________
AΞΔ - Courage, Graciousness, & Peace
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2010, 02:53 AM
Drolefille Drolefille is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by amanda6035 View Post
^^ I agree. I just hope the military actually punishes those people who deserve to be punished.
I'm fairly confident they will. Maybe not for harassment, which has been a pretty consistent problem, but definitely for physical violence. Ultimately I don't think the command structure will tolerate someone who attacks another soldier for orientation anymore than they will for attacking someone based on race. Particularly since the command structure is as on board with this as the the combat troops are if not more so.

Now, if they could handle sexual assaults better, I'd be ready to stop complaining about them entirely.
__________________
From the SigmaTo the K!
Polyamorous, Pansexual and Proud of it!
It Gets Better
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2010, 03:18 AM
PiKA2001 PiKA2001 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drolefille View Post
I'm fairly confident they will. Maybe not for harassment, which has been a pretty consistent problem, but definitely for physical violence. Ultimately I don't think the command structure will tolerate someone who attacks another soldier for orientation anymore than they will for attacking someone based on race. Particularly since the command structure is as on board with this as the the combat troops are if not more so.

Now, if they could handle sexual assaults better, I'd be ready to stop complaining about them entirely.
I think you're getting the poll results confused. Around 60% of combat troops believe that the repeal of DADT would hurt troop morale and hinder operations. The support troops ( medical, services, logistics, civil engineering, communications) are the ones who think that the repeal would have little to no repercussions.

ETA- I wouldn't necessarily say that the "Command Structure" is on board with this. Yeah, Gates and the Joint Chiefs may be on board but for the average troop the only chain of command that really matters/affects them is their own unit/brigade/squadron/wing Commander who could be a total homophobe.

Last edited by PiKA2001; 12-19-2010 at 03:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2010, 03:28 AM
Drolefille Drolefille is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001 View Post
I think you're getting the poll results confused. Around 60% of combat troops believe that the repeal of DADT would hurt troop morale and hinder operations. The support troops ( medical, services, logistics, civil engineering, communications) are the ones who think that the repeal would have little to no repercussions.
That number ranges from 40-60% of "Marine corps and various combat specialties" troops depending on what branch you're talking about so only quoting the high number, which is from the Marines I believe, is misleading. But reread again, I said the command staff is at least as on board with it as the combat troops, if not more so.

And they are more so. If individual commander A is a complete homophobe, he better follow the orders of his superior who isn't. Seriously how is this different from racially integrating the military. If they'd taken a poll then what kind of answer do you think they would have gotten? And it was incredibly successful, even if sometimes an individual is a complete racist.

Although if you want the details here's the complete report:
266 pages, pdf

But that doesn't change the fact that if any member of our military cannot follow orders - for any reason really but particularly- because the thought of a gay service member existing in his unit so enrages her or scares him, they shouldn't be serving.
__________________
From the SigmaTo the K!
Polyamorous, Pansexual and Proud of it!
It Gets Better

Last edited by Drolefille; 12-19-2010 at 03:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Senate Votes Down Debate on Repeal of "Don't Ask Don't Tell" agzg News & Politics 14 12-10-2010 02:19 PM
Lady Gaga rallies for 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal in Maine NinjaPoodle News & Politics 28 10-01-2010 04:35 PM
Cali senate passes bill to lower voting age to 14 The1calledTKE News & Politics 17 05-10-2004 12:41 AM
Weigh In: Senate Passes Ban on Late Term Abortion MereMere21 News & Politics 125 11-07-2003 04:12 PM
Looks like the Republicans have the Senate... Kevin News & Politics 55 11-11-2002 02:06 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.