Quote:
Originally posted by lovele1978
I heard on the radio this morning that it has not been confirmed that Sparkle was the one that handed in the tape. IMO if she is the one that turned the tape over, shouldn't she be charged with knowing this information for so long and not turning him in?? I don't think that she turned in the tape because she felt as if her neice was wronged by Kelly, I think that this was her way at getting back at him for whatever personal beef they have. If she was that concerned she would have turned the tape over to the POLICE and not the media from the jump!
|
I totally agree with you on her turning the tape over sooner. (IF she was the one who turned it in) IMHO I think she is the one that turned it in. Because as soon as the isht hit the fan, SHE WAS THE FIRST ONE SAYING THAT, THE GIRL ON THE TAPE WAS HER NIECE. Now i'm like the tape JUST CAME OUT, how did you come to that conclusion so quickly.
Anyway, you know the parents of sparkle's neice is saying that, it isn't her in the video.
On the radio this morning, their was a lawyer(not on the case) saying that THEY (assuming the police) are looking for the girl IN THE VIDEO, to prove that she was a minor at the time and still is a minor. I was thinking, any girl could come up and say that, it is her in the video. Whoever she is, she is probably to embarrassed to say anything, due the the nature of what's going on. DO YOU ALSO KNOW that same lawyer on the radio also said that there is a chance that he may not serve all 15 years, and that he could get out in 6-9 months
, and that's IF HE GOES TO TRIAL, AND IS CONVICTED ON ALL 21 COUNTS.
It's always some loopholes somewhere.
Threaded Mode