GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 331,483
Threads: 115,707
Posts: 2,207,605
Welcome to our newest member, aathonyyandexto
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 10-05-2010, 04:45 PM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee View Post
This is done between some cities around here HOWEVER, the money is included in city/county taxes and then is transferred by that entity to the municipality who performs the fire service. Making it optional is insane to me.
Well, there's that whole thing about small government, reducing the consumer burden by eliminating non-essential or overly-cost-ineffective services, potential issues with what are essentially government-run insurance programs, etc.

You can certainly see why some people would want to opt out - similar to other forms of insurance, the majority will never have a fire event and thus are "wasting" the $75 to subsidize others. You might even argue that making it optional is the most sane thing - it's the only option that allows the individual to make their own rational decision. Surely you like making your own decisions, right?

Quote:
The saddest part is that their next door neighbor's house caught on fire because this house was on fire. The neighbor had paid the $75 fee so his house fire was put out.
This is more "bad luck" than "sad" - after all, that's why the neighbor paid the $75: you never know what will cause a fire in your home. It might even be the neighbors.

Quote:
In making it optional, it endangers others even those who do choose to pay.
Presumably, the majority of folks who live in rural areas don't live all that close to their neighbors, making this a very low-level risk to "endanger others." That's why it is perfectly reasonable to levy taxes in cities to pay for municipal services (assuming risk), and also perfectly reasonable to not do the same in rural areas (markedly lower risk).

Quote:
Can that neighbor now sue this clown for not paying for his fire service and having his house catch on fire as a result?
He can attempt to sue him, sure - whether or not that suit has merit and/or will be successful is, of course, a completely different matter and depends on approximately seven hundred and twenty factors we really don't know.

Quote:
There are definitely better ways to implement this.
It seems this method worked perfectly to me.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U of Southern Maine: House Seizure OK'd: Unpaid Property Taxes (Phi Kappa Sigma) exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 0 06-24-2010 05:29 PM
Georgia School Board Hires Collection Agency to Collect on Unpaid Lunches DaemonSeid News & Politics 33 04-28-2010 09:16 PM
Flag Burning Amendment Advances In House WCUgirl News & Politics 83 07-06-2005 05:54 PM
Blackface Incident -- Police and Firemen CrimsonTide4 Delta Sigma Theta 17 06-27-2003 03:27 PM
NY Firemen amycat412 Chit Chat 1 10-08-2001 01:41 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.