|
I knew what deepimpact meant. However, as the article I posted states, this nominee's gender identity and/or sexual orientation is really an unfounded debate. How would it be catering to a particular agenda or group if she isn't proven to fit in that particular group?
However2, I am sick of everything being considered a socio-demographic agenda or catering to a nonpolitical group. Every white male nominee is not automatically part of the white male privilege agenda. Every Black nominee is not automatically part of the Black agenda. Every female nominee is not automatically part of the feminist agenda. Reducing everything to an agenda or an attempt to kiss the ass for a particular group is paranoia and an unnecessary distraction. Socio-politics are stupid enough without that. Obama is lackluster enough without that.
Last edited by DrPhil; 05-11-2010 at 08:04 PM.
|
Threaded Mode
