People here are getting a bit frazzled. This conversation is going in vicious circles and getting more hurtful every time I check the thread.
I think that BOTH sides have good points.
I promised that I would give no more of my opinions on the actual subject at hand so I won't
A lot of people (on both sides) are using a very confrontational, aggressive style of approaching this.
When this style is used the person on the recieving end (or someone who percieves themselves to be there) AUTOMATICALLY goes to the defensive.
We know what it's like trying to explain our side of things to someone who's on the defensive. Kind of like banging your head on a brick wall.
------------------
THE POINT OF THIS POST:
Both sides have stated their case, there CLEARLY will be no resolution to this (at least in the manner in which it is being argued). I'd suggest that if you have something bugging you, take it up in PM with the person you disagree with (civilly)
(and maybe, PLEASE, let this thread fade away, I don't personally like the idea of locking down a thread just because there is some contraversy)
Otherwise, go bang your head on a brick wall
Respectfully,
Kevin
MT #5
University of Central Oklahoma
Any new points?
Hybrid Mode
