Woman claims "I was sterlized against my will!" after having 9 children...

[Psi U MC Vito]

Originally Posted by als463

ASUADPi hit the nail on the head. She is on public assistance, but then she claims she is "taking care of her kids." I hate when people say that. Why do people say, "My kids are always dressed in name brand clothes, I take care of my kids." I hear people talk all the time about how they provide for their children because their kids are the best-dressed or have the nicest toys. Taking care of your kids does not mean sitting them in front of a television set, eating government cheese and sipping on Mountain Dew.

This b**** needs to get a job and get a clue. Personally, I think we should sterilize anyone who LIVES on the system for a certain period of time. If you keep having children and you constantly get them taken away from you or you are living on the sytem their entire lives, you need to be sterilized. As a former Caseworker, I can say that if you lose your parental rights to any of your children, you should be sterilized. I'm gonna' get flamed for this, but in times like this, I say screw constitutional rights. Some people are too stupid to make decisions for themselves. Wrong! It is NOT just her body. It is the lives of her children that she brought into the world with little stability.

Wow, this story really got me mad!

*Claps*

Again I ask, what constitutional rights have been violated? Yes I do do agree human rights have been violated, but what does this mess have to do with the Constitution?

[agzg]

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito

Again I ask, what constitutional rights have been violated? Yes I do do agree human rights have been violated, but what does this mess have to do with the Constitution?

Where does it say that she (or her lawyer) said that they violated her constitutional rights? All I'm seeing is that she's saying they violated her reproductive rights, which they did.

Originally Posted by als463

How is talking about her abusing the system not relevant to thread? Other people said the same thing. It might be about that. It may not have been right for them to perform this surgery/ operation without her consent, but maybe instead of crying that she wasn't treated properly, we should give these Doctors a pat on the back.

Might be relative to the thread, is not relative to the case. I'm not one for handing out pats on the back for medical malpractice, because that is (allegedly) what happened.

[Psi U MC Vito]

Originally Posted by agzg

Where does it say that she (or her lawyer) said that they violated her constitutional rights? All I'm seeing is that she's saying they violated her reproductive rights, which they did.

Right here.

Savicki’s attorney, Max Borten of Waltham, alleges that his client’s human and constitutional rights were violated and that the hospital had a “total breakdown of protocols.”

[agzg]

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito

Right here.

Missed that. The GC legal eagles would have to draw the connection there.

[als463]

LOL...Did you guys check out the comments section? You have people on there complaining about it, yet they clearly didn't read through it. I get it that the story upsets people, but at least read through it before you comment on it. One guy wrote something about how if she is living on the system or on disability, then she should be sterilized. I agree that she should be sterilized, but it clearly states in the story that she is living off the system and on disability. People are making comments about the story saying, "Well if this...then that," without actually seeing what they are talking about was actually addressed. I love it!

[Gusteau]

Originally Posted by agzg

Might be relative to the thread, is not relative to the case. I'm not one for handing out pats on the back for medical malpractice, because that is (allegedly) what happened.

THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS.

Wow, I'm breaking all my GC rules tonight - 1. Using "THIS" is annoying., 2. Don't talk about "issues" on GC, stick to Greek Life.