Here's my thing. The article states this...
"Savicki has nine children from several men, is unemployed and relies on public assistance for two of the four children who live with her. She receives supplemental security income, or SSI, for a disability, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, she said. Her mother has custody of three of her children. Two of her children are no longer minors."
But then she goes on to state this...
"“I take care of my kids. I love my kids. I was not ready to make that kind of decision,” she said of the permanent sterilization."
Pardon me while I scratch my head.
How do you take care of your kids when you are unemployed, receiving social security, government assistance and mom has custody of 3 of them?
This woman is a frickin' moron. She is just as bad as octomom!
She also seems quite sue happy, since she sued once before she got pregnant (claimed that she was sold expired spermicide
)
I don't feel sorry for her whatsoever.
I also feel that since the doctors can't tell "their side" of the story, that we aren't getting the "whole" story. For all we know she could have signed something agreeing to a tubal ligation and is now pissed because she can't have baby number 10 (that too would end up on government assistance).
Threaded Mode
