Quote:
Originally Posted by I.A.S.K.
Just read the bolded one more time and see if it still makes sense. Because women may have come in to contact with or even know their attacker they're more responsible for the crimes committed against them than dogs that have no choice about who they spend time around? Well if thats the case blame the dogs. They could've run away. They knew their attackers. They ate food the attackers fed them. Or do the dogs have battered pet syndrome?
|
No, dipshit, that is not what I said.
I said at some point, women chose to be in the company of their attacker - unless they were mugged on the street/raped at gunpoint. None of which we are talking about here. I did not say they chose to be raped or get AIDS or whatever or were "asking for it" or are responsible.
These animals never, ever chose to be in the company of Michael Vick or any of his equally sick asshole friends. This isn't Animal Farm where the animals can revolt, although it would have been the bomb diggity if it were.
Why do people freak out more over the rape of a baby than the rape of a grown woman? I mean, I'm sure that baby will forget all about it by the time it grows up. Babies don't know any better. (This is called SARCASM by the way.)
Threaded Mode
