|
» GC Stats |
Members: 334,358
Threads: 115,803
Posts: 2,209,941
|
| Welcome to our newest member, maisonpetrovoz4 |
|
 |

07-23-2009, 12:20 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 6,304
|
|
|
I know I'm late to this party, but...
Why are we focusing on how he was handcuffed? If this has some underlying meaning, which some people here seem to imply, wouldn't it tell you that they DIDN'T have a bias and they were considerate enough not to cuff him behind his back?
Obama should not have commented on this, if for no other reason than to not make HIMSELF look biased. While he said the officer acted "stupidly," he also admitted, "I don't know all the facts." No one does, therefore, why is the President making such a strong, public statement when he doesn't know the details of the situation?
I, also, do not know all of the facts. But I do have a question... has Gates denied that he became enraged and caused a scene?
__________________
I believe in the values of friendship and fidelity to purpose
@~/~~~~
|

07-23-2009, 12:24 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASTalumna06
I know I'm late to this party, but...
Why are we focusing on how he was handcuffed? If this has some underlying meaning, which some people here seem to imply, wouldn't it tell you that they DIDN'T have a bias and they were considerate enough not to cuff him behind his back?
Obama should not have commented on this, if for no other reason than to not make HIMSELF look biased. While he said the officer acted "stupidly," he also admitted, "I don't know all the facts." No one does, therefore, why is the President making such a strong, public statement when he doesn't know the details of the situation?
I, also, do not know all of the facts. But I do have a question... has Gates denied that he became enraged and caused a scene?
|
I don't think Gates ever denied being angry. As far as causing "a scene," that is subjective. Following the officer and requesting ID would not necessarily make some people think he caused a scene. I think people are forgetting that we have the right to ask for that information and they have to give it. It's not an option for them.
__________________
Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm afraid of it.
|

07-23-2009, 01:08 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 6,304
|
|
|
Sidenote: I'm listening to 96.9 fm talk (out of Boston) online, and I am currently listening to someone who called in to say that this is racial profiling. He said, "The neighbor called and had to give a description, and said the burglar is black, and the police responded to that call because of the description." What? People are so ignorant.
__________________
I believe in the values of friendship and fidelity to purpose
@~/~~~~
Last edited by ASTalumna06; 07-24-2009 at 01:12 AM.
|

07-23-2009, 01:15 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
|
|
|
Police normaly handcuff behind the back unless there is a physical problem which it seemed was there and the cuffs were placed in the front of him.
Did anyone notice that the sgt. was not the only officer there and in the front of the picture there was a black officer in it?
|

07-23-2009, 02:58 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASTalumna06
Why are we focusing on how he was handcuffed? If this has some underlying meaning, which some people here seem to imply, wouldn't it tell you that they DIDN'T have a bias and they were considerate enough not to cuff him behind his back?
|
It "tells" "us" whatever "we" perceive and interpret it as "telling" "us."
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|