Quote:
Originally Posted by srmom
You know, the problem I have with this changing of parties during your term (whether it be by Repubs or Dems - Spector and Leiberman) is that you were elected in your district by people and supported by the party from which you ran.
I know I may be naive, but supposedly, we live in a democracy, where you are elected as a representative of your constituents, and you vote and act for their interests while in Congress. Your not supposed to be acting in your own self interest (in order to keep your phony baloney job!!). Changing parties, mid term, is basically telling your constituents, the people who voted for you - to **** off! .
|
In Pa there was a shift in registration. Part of his base already switched parties.
Specter's base is as much Dems as Republicans because Specter's key support comes from organized labor. The kicker is that Specter told organized labor to F-off when he did not support the card check bill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by srmom
This is all about him trying to get reelected. It's not because of some noble ideological change (which would still be wrong, because he's supposed to be voting for his constituents, not his own opinions or purposes).
I have no problem with people changing parties after their term is over, or announcing toward the next election cycle that they plan on doing so. At least then, they would be honest about what they are actually there for.
|
Hybrid Mode
