GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Phi > Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia

» GC Stats
Members: 331,355
Threads: 115,705
Posts: 2,207,498
Welcome to our newest member, zbenjaminlittez
» Online Users: 5,394
1 members and 5,393 guests
Phrozen Sands
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old 04-14-2009, 02:12 PM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boodleboy322 View Post
I am not re-writing history - the key words are "Even though many brothers feel it was". Whether that feeling was invoked because of a participation in a Professional Conference, initiation time period or because of some terminology that was deleted in 1985, I can assure you that when Father Mills began the Social Men's Club at NEC this specific wording or perception didn't exist.

Sure, I acknowledge the fact that brothers got initiated when the group was officially "Professional". My point is that when when this fraternity began it had social origins for men of music.
Not trying to argue. Perhaps it is the choice of words that is . . . confusing.

I will not argue at all with your statement that Father Mills founded the Sinfonia as a social fraternity. The idea that we were a professional fraternity was never in his mind or in the minds of others influential in or founding and early development. To rightly assert that is not the same as saying that Phi Mu Alpha was never a professional fraternity. And you seem to agree with this when you say "Sure, I acknowledge the fact that brothers got initiated when the group was officially 'Professional.'" If you acknowledge that there was a time when we were "officially professional," then why say "Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia never really was a Professional Organization even though many brothers feel it was"?

The latter statement implies two things that are giving me problems: that at no time in our history were we officially a professional organization, and that anyone who thinks we were is basing that thought on uninformed perception rather than reality. That's what makes it sound like history is being re-written, since as you say, there was a time when we were officially professional.

By declaring ourselves a professional fraternity, we strayed from our founding ideals and the intentions of Father Mills and others, but that doesn't change the fact that we did officially do it. Isn't it sufficient (and more accurate to the point you're making about the intent when we were founded) simply to say that Phi Mu Alpha was not founded to be a professional fraternity?

Fraternally,
MysticCat
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898

Last edited by MysticCat; 04-14-2009 at 02:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
any bros from Marietta College in OH? sanjiyan69 Lambda Chi Alpha 2 01-05-2009 08:23 PM
New interest group sigmapi-peppers Sigma Pi 2 02-28-2008 01:52 AM
Interest group question _Opi_ Recruitment 10 03-23-2004 04:18 PM
Auburn interest group? tmyonah Sigma Alpha 4 11-07-2003 12:57 PM
Georgetown College Interest Group JoinerLxa Alpha Phi Omega 1 10-04-2003 05:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.