Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
As KSig pointed out, that's a moralistic argument [one I disagree with], not a legal one. The issue here is bailment --was there one when the pictures were uploaded to the internet? (google the word if you don't know what it is).
If there was bailment, there is going to be liability (assuming there are no other mitigating facts). It's really not a tough issue.
|
Did I seem to be trying to making a legal argument?
ETA: I think that I've been trying to say what I think ought to be true, rather than making any claims about what legal is true.
Hybrid Mode
