Man Held in Slaying of JonBenet Ramsay

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by madmax

What exactly is the new DNA evidence? There was dna that didn't match the Ramseys years ago.

This was your first posting:
"madmax has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - Man Held in Slaying of JonBenet Ramsay - in the News & Politics forum of GreekChat.com Forums.

This thread is located at:
http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/sh...0&goto=newpost

Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************

---Quote (Originally by honeychile)---

Bottom line is, the first and best suspects are always in the family. It's usually a matter of proving that it's not someone from the family than it is. Do I want the Ramseys to have defiled their little girl? No. Do I suspect that they had *something* to do with it? Absolutely.
---End Quote---
Not true. According to FBI crime stats less than 30% of the known homicides were committed by family members."

Just where did you locate your information on this?
I know that 5 years and under:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/children.htm
A parent is the perpetrator in most homicides of children under age 5
Of all children under age 5 murdered from 1976-2005 --

• 31% were killed by fathers
• 29% were killed by mothers
• 23% were killed by male acquaintances
• 7% were killed by other relatives
• 3% were killed by strangers

As for your "new posting", read the story linked or any other news story about it.

[epchick]

Really Jon, all you had do was point to this quote, instead of making another "refer back to my post" post.

New DNA tests, which focus on skin cells left behind from a mere touch, point to a mysterious outsider.

"That genetic profile belongs to a male and does not belong to anyone in the Ramsey family,” the district attorney’s office said in a statement. “The unexplained third party DNA on the clothing of the victim is very significant and powerful evidence.”