SEX

SydneyK · #1 05-07-2008, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek

I think for men it's visual, but for women it's for more reasons than that.

This statement implies that for men, attraction is strictly visual. Why else specify that there's more involved for women?

If your statement doesn't mean that there's more involved for men, then don't single out the women and say we're the only ones who consider more than visual cues.

DaemonSeid · #2 05-07-2008, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneyK

This statement implies that for men, attraction is strictly visual. Why else specify that there's more involved for women?

If your statement doesn't mean that there's more involved for men, then don't single out the women and say we're the only ones who consider more than visual cues.

see...you missed the first two words...and that is what I was trying to tell you BEFORE.

"I THINK..."

If she had omitted that out from the beginning then the whole statement on BOTH sides would become more concrete....do you see the logic of that yet??

SydneyK · #3 05-07-2008, 11:13 AM

ALL of this is clouded with an "I think". None of us know. It's all opinion. Her opinion (as I've gathered from her own posts) is that men are strictly visual. I even said that her words SUGGEST that men are strictly visual (no where in this whole mess of a thread did I ever say she came right out and said it - it's suggested, or implied).

I think she's wrong.

And I think this thread's a hellamess, so I'm bowing out.

DaemonSeid · #4 05-07-2008, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneyK

ALL of this is clouded with an "I think". None of us know. It's all opinion. Her opinion (as I've gathered from her own posts) is that men are strictly visual. I even said that her words SUGGEST that men are strictly visual (no where in this whole mess of a thread did I ever say she came right out and said it - it's suggested, or implied).

I think she's wrong.

And I think this thread's a hellamess, so I'm bowing out.

I know that actually may be a good idea right now...

DSTCHAOS · #5 05-07-2008, 08:27 PM

Humans are visual.

Studies have not found conclusively that humans who are biologically male, and gendered as boys or men, are inherently (read: born--before socialization) more visual.

That's all.

cheerfulgreek · #6 05-08-2008, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

I know that actually may be a good idea right now...

lol

You chased her away. You're so mean.

DaemonSeid · #7 05-08-2008, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek

lol

You chased her away. You're so mean.

it's what I do...sometimes I have that effect on people...but really, I am a very nice guy!

DSTCHAOS · #8 05-08-2008, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

it's what I do...sometimes I have that effect on people...but really, I am a very nice guy!

She shouldn't have left. You ain't nobody.

cheerfulgreek · #9 05-09-2008, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

it's what I do...sometimes I have that effect on people...but really, I am a very nice guy!

lol

I know. I was kidding when I said you were mean.

cheerfulgreek · #10 05-07-2008, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneyK

This statement implies that for men, attraction is strictly visual. Why else specify that there's more involved for women?

If your statement doesn't mean that there's more involved for men, then don't single out the women and say we're the only ones who consider more than visual cues.

Sydney, you're adding again.

I never used the word strictly. I didn't imply anything. You took it the way you read it by adding things that were never said. It is more than visual for women. Go back and re-read PrettyBoy's post.