Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
No, it doesn't -- not according to any actual definition of hazing I have ever seen (as opposed to rampant popular misconception about what constitutes hazing) -- and it's just plain silly to claim otherwise.
|
I think that legal definitions of hazing are pretty good, but that the anti-hazing plans that GLOs have or the execution of those plans in the hands of undergraduates get goofy sometimes.
I think there's a tendency today to classify any number of risk management issues as hazing rather than explaining the difference that you can't to this because it's hazing vs. you can't do that because it's likely to be stupidly dangerous.
Threaded Mode
