Quote:
Originally Posted by southernelle25
Sure, they say that, but then they become upset when the children are born pure white in appearance or simply non-black, which is certainly possible given the already mixed heritage of most African Americans. I have read too many stories about black men abusing, emotionally and sometimes physically, their children (born of white women) for being "too light". I have seen posts online from men complaining because they thought their children would be born "with some color", i.e. "kinda light" with "good hair". These men don't consider that their children may not look anything like what they expect racially, that they may find it difficult to relate to sons who more closely resemble Wentworth Miller or "the man" than themselves. Though I feel for the children, I can't help but laugh at those who roll the dice and lose.
|
You know I had no idea who that little boy is, nor his political "genetic inheritance"... Now that is funny...
My little nephew is gonna look JUST like homey when he grows up...
Anyhow, do you have any references to those stories you read? I just do not understand why bruhs would do that when it was exactly what they wanted? The alternative is SOME bruhs are misogynists--generally speaking and would beat any kind of woman and their children because of power issues and compensation.
Threaded Mode